Father's synopsis on his post is thus:
1. On the strict calculus, Catholics cannot normally vote for candidates who endorse a disqualifying, grave moral evil.
2. Both major-party candidates endorse a disqualifying, grave moral evil: Obama>abortion; McCain>embryo-destroying "research."
3. Therefore, Catholics by the strict calculus would not normally be able to vote for either of these, on the strict calculus.
4. Catholics can set aside the strict calculus, and vote for a candidate who endorses a normally disqualifying, grave moral evil if there is no alternative--no candidate who doesn't endorse grave moral evil.
Several posters adequately address his points. My response is below:
UPDATE: What a blessing this priest is - so deep is his love for Christ's Church and the truth that he fights the urge to compromise with passion. That feisty quality will come in handy!
Father,
A few rebuttals if I may-
>As you duly note, McCain felt the pressure and acted accordingly with the nomination. Obama would pay us no heed if he were to get into office and policies and appointments would be devastating to the unborn.
>ESR is moot. Women are not contributing their eggs and the number of offenses against the unborn cannot possibly equate to an administration that supports abortion up until the moment of birth and withholding treatment from a survivor of a botched abortion. This position is sociopathic.
>Palin will not attract the most extreme proabort feminists. This appointment will attract people who were uncertain McCain would kowtow to our pressure (he just proved he will enthusiastically. She will attract mainstream Mommies.
>There is no such thing as a "strict calculus" when two candidates take positions offensive to Catholic doctrines. If one candidate was believer in ethnic cleansing,abortion,moral ambiguity, the abolition of God from the public square and education and other communist philosophies and the other candidate supported ESR which is nearly non-existent, voting for the former instead of the latter is a collaboration in such grave societal evils that it defies common sense.
Keeping a lunatic out of office is the only sensible objective Catholics must use in evaluating such options.
Voting for a candidate we know can't possibly win is as senseless as twiddling one's thumbs when a drunk man gets behind the wheel of a car in our presence.