Sunday, October 31, 2010

Gross Mismanagement of the Boston Catholic Ghouls

I am still battling this cold/flu.  (Week 3) and have not been able to get everything on my radar I should be getting on there but I hope that you have all been keeping up with the breathtaking revelations at Boston Catholic Insider about the Seminary Squeezola and the fax campaign on the scam committee for the head lobbyist at the Mass Catholic Conference.

When you read how little (Jack Connors) Boston College paid for the assets of the seminary, be sure to carefully read this ten page response of the rector to the shady proposal and his ultimate the resignation letter of the former rector seminary Fr. Farren and then compare the situation to the Caritas giveaway.

The way in which a $65 million project was presented with no advance specific information that would allow study,evaluationand consultation, and then be voted favorably is incomprehensible to meThe fact that no one in the Seminary was consulted, or even informedabout the proposal is incomprehensible to meThe fact that public events to announce the news were scheduled even before our meeting was held last night and are being carried out this morning is incomprehensible to me. Finallythe fact that announcements are being made to the public with no vote taken at all by the Corporate Members is not only incomprehensible to mebut is contrary to law. Last night’s meeting was a burlesque of the Board of Trustees and of the ways of proceeding of any serious board.
Even more distressing to me is the substance of last night’s “deliberations.“  Exaggerated statements about a projected budgetary deficit for FY08 served as the point of departure for the presentation, the explicit recommendations of the Congregation for Catholic Education were dismissed peremptorallya proposal was made to remedy a problem that we do not have, the remedy proposed is that the seminary alienate assets that are needed to assure its future fiscal viabilityand all this was done in the name of assuring our financial stability and viabilityIn my judgment, all of this is utterly preposterous.
For the second time in three yearsRCAB plunders the assets of St. John’s Seminary. In 2004, the seminary conveyed to RCAB assets worth about $56 million and received in recompense $21 million and a promissory note for $4.8 million. If the seminary were in possession of even the cash represented by the noteour financial “problems” would be greatly eased. Instead the seminary is presented as “not able to make it financially.” Nowassets of the seminary will be taken and combined again with assets of RCABwho will in turn sell them to BC. The Chancellor stated emphatically last night that the seminary will not be recompensed according to the value of the assets conveyed, but the $65 million to be derived from this sale will be applied “where it is needed.” Clearly, in this disposition the seminary is considered as not one of the “needs” of the archdiocese – even as a beneficiary of its own assets.

Sadly, with all of the exposing Boston Catholics have been doing, we have only seen the tip of the iceberg of the corruption in the Archdiocese.

No comments: