Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Synod Day 2: The Fix is in: When the kids shack up, lets call it ...Californication?

Maybe we could have a contest for the most creative ideas to disguise sin.

Why not call all sleeping around something really cutesy.

Rolling on the hay?

I have an idea.

Let's scratch all the language about adultery, fornication, sodomy and call it something androngynous but fun, like....making whoopie.

We could use Frank Sinatra's theme song.

Another bride, another June.
Another sunny honeymoon
Another season, another reason
For making whoppie.

I am a little flummoxed about what to do with the Sixth Commandment.

Though shalt not make whoppie still doesn't get Pope Francis where he wants to be.

Oh wait..that must be where pretending Commandments and Doctrine doesn't exist comes into play.

I cannot stand another day of these horses asses.

Going to be a long painful two weeks of coverage here at TTC!

p.s. They did not discuss a new name for the devil but I am rooting for Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.

6 comments:

Netmilsmom said...

So if fornication as a sin can be ignored, are all the other sins up for grabs? How about the Precepts of the Church? It's way too hard to make it to Mass on Sunday, and the cash I give, that's WAY to difficult. Don't even get me started on Holy Days.
And my neighbor got a Sweet new car. I'd really like it.

JB said...



Mundabor said it best: (after the Synod) "Ideally, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife."

Venerable Ann-Catherine Emmerich seems to have foretold this time. She wrote of the time of "two popes" talking to each other, and the "baleful" consequences that would flow from it.

Anonymous said...

I'm not trying to be facetious ....is it possible that many of these men of the hierarchy are not in the state of grace themselves??? what I'm gleaning from all this happy horse dung is that there's alot of individuals participating in this SinNod who are trying to make life in the church much more agreeable with their own consciences and lifestyles. God help us! I'm sure we ain't seen nothing yet!

Anonymous said...

I'm not trying to be facetious ....is it possible that many of these men of the hierarchy are not in the state of grace themselves??? what I'm gleaning from all this happy horse dung is that there's alot of individuals participating in this SinNod who are trying to make life in the church much more agreeable with their own consciences and lifestyles. God help us! I'm sure we ain't seen nothing yet!

Mike Hurcum said...

what do you mean anonymous. Not in a state of grace? So many are not and by Catechism teaching many of the rest are not either, because of their neglect in correcting their brothers. Any if only slightly authorization of adultery is promoting mortal or grave sin. If this Synod in any way leads to that conclusion in any Catholic Mind then watch out for fireworks right after,

Restore-DC-Catholicism said...

Anonymous of 12:07pm, thank you for the term "SinNod"! I've decided to adopt it in my own writings on the SinNod.

And yes, it's not only possible they aren't in a state of grace. I think it highly probable, and they are trying to twist Christ's teachings to assuage their own guilty consciences.