The Jesuits thought this guy's theological morass was the place they wanted to lead Catholic students.
A macabre example of the decades of malpractice by Jesuits.
I was speaking to a Catholic friend who is desperately holding onto the delusion that Pope Francis' appointment of Cardinals Kasper and Marx to lead theology on the family is naive booboo.
I asked him.
If Cardinal Kasper had spent his life encouraging people to litter the earth and pollute the ocean, do you think the Pope would announce to his see that Kasper's theology was outstanding and needs to be spread into the world?
If Kasper gave a speech to his see of Bishops about the pastoral value of seeing virtue in throwing cigarettes and empty booze bottles into the ocean, do you think for a New York minute the Pope would have stood up and applauded?
If he had, you'd think a mad man has been set loose.
Which is precisely the same conclusion many have painfully reached after observing him hand-pick a Cardinal who has spent his vocation teaching children to defile the temple of the Holy Spirit with the virtue he sees in sodomy, and asking his see of Bishops to teach this instead of the 2000 years of moral theology. What is put into the the sexual orifices of our children is much more important than what is thrown into the ocean or onto the ground.
Pope Francis, and in fact the entire order of Jesuits, know perfectly well how to exclude teachers who convey ideas of the father of destruction.
This is why you never see them appointing a warmonger to the peace and justice commissions. This is why there isn't a school or apostolate or dicastry in Christendom with a litterbug appointed to head the science department. They know perfectly well that were they to do so, they would make a mockery out of the respect for the environment we are teaching at home and would ultimately result in more children littering.
The same holds true for appointing a man that tells people to see adultery as virtuous. They know the outcome of that action debunks and mocks moral theology we teach at home. They are dividing and fracturing our children from Catholic moral theology like a vulture following the farmer planting seeds.
They are the world's leading experts in the practice of picking people for the ideas they teach to bring about the result of children believing and practicing those ideas.
Pope Francis hasn't appointed anyone who is preaching we should all resist recycling. That is intentional. He doesn't want the appointment, and the subsequent preaching to resist recycling to damage something he obviously cares about.
The same logic holds true when he has a Cardinal on his hands that is teaching his nation that breaking the commandments is virtuous. If a pope didn't want people to think breaking commandments is virtuous, he would not appoint such an individual. He would not invite that individual to teach his see. He would not sit in the audience while the individual conveyed those ideas. He would not follow the conveyance of the idea that adultery is virtue (at his invitation) with applause and instructions to distribute the skullduggery to his people on the parish level.
Nobody could ever convince anyone sane that he has the wherewithall to protect the earth from the appointment of litterbugs but he would expose his children's bodies and souls to the polluted ideas of Cardinals Kasper and Marx.
If it were an unintentional flaw in his intellect and reasoning, you would see him packing up the popemobile with dirty diapers and dumping them into the Mediterranean.
But as it stands, there is very little room to conclude anything other than the Holy Father desire to leave clean dirt under the feet of children following Cardinal Kasper's teaching that adultery is virtuous and to ensure clean air for those suffering the ill effects of the reception of the Blessed Sacrament in a state of mortal sin from the heretical theological environment he is hammering into every home.
It's very important that people attending Elton John's gay wedding have clean air to breathe. But what is even more important is a Pope that creates a theological environment that would have debunked the Catholic SCOTUS justices understanding that the Pope believes gay marriage is ok. He had 2 1/2 years to debunk the theological environment being promulgated on his behalf. He did not do it. Though he was begged.
The temptations and consequences that resulted from the theological environment is catastrophic to life and liberty, religious freedom and salvation. He has, to this day, said nothing.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to an aphorism my mother used to use when she knew I was lying to her: You can't bleep the bleeper.
The Holy Father reportedly said that the Church should limit the terms of Its Popes. I love the first comment on this thread:
Ready when you are, Holy Father. Let me know if you need help moving