Showing posts with label Governor Strickland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Governor Strickland. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Public Information Request regarding Eric McFadden

January 27, 2009


Via email


Kent Marcus, Esq.
Christine Thompson, Esq.
General Counsel, Gov. Ted Strickland
State Capitol
77 Sough High Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Dear Ms. Thompson and Mr. Marcus:
Please accept this request for information relating to a complaint filed by me in October of 2007 with Kent Marcus and Christine Thompson in Governor Strickland's Office of General Counsel that made allegations that Mr. Eric McFadden of the Governor's Office of Faith-Based Initiatives was a dangerous person - in particular to women. Mr. McFadden used internet resources to threaten, stalk, sexually harass – including using sexual terminology in a perverted and inappropriate manner, compulsively sent communications to me and to others, so numerous and consecutive, that their intention was to intimidate. I reported that given my experiences with Mr. McFadden I was very concerned he was victimizing others and in particular, women.

Within days of my complaint, Mr. McFadden was removed from the OFBI and transferred to the employ of State of Ohio Correctional Facility and shortly thereafter was appointed to Ms. Hillary Clinton's campaign - which Governor Strickland was deeply involve in and was rumored to be Ms. Clinton's first choice candidate for Vice President.

Given Mr McFadden's deranged and dangerous conduct to women, including sexual obsession and solicitation and compulsive obscene postings, compelling prostitution of a minor, pursuant to any and all applicable Freedom of Information and Sunshine Laws of the State of Ohio, I would like to obtain a copy of the following records:
1. Written and electronic communication relating to my complaint, including copies of my communications.
2. Written and electronic records, including actions taken to investigate my complaint, findings of any conducted investigation, emails and internet traffic reports of Mr. McFadden's computer relating to sexual solicitation, implied or overt threats to those he philosophically opposed, instructions to staff and employment decisions made based upon those findings.
3. A detailed written account of Mr. McFadden's hours of employment at the Office of Faith Based Initiatives that chronicles his days of attendance as well as any days he was absent, on vacation or used sick time as this is germane to match against his time and date stamped public postings on the web.
4. Any information relating to the decision to shuffle him into the employ of the corrections system.

I understand that if I seek a copy of this record, there may be a copying fee. Please inform me of that cost prior to making the copy. I can be reached at #XXX-XXX-XXXX or email at cmmckinley@aol.com.


According to the statutes, this request should be acted upon as soon as possible, but in no event later than the third business day following receipt of this letter. If access to the records I requested is going to take longer, please contact me so we can work out a reasonable date.

If you choose to deny the request, then you are required to respond in writing and state the statutory exception authorizing the withholding of all or part of the public record and the name and title or position of the person responsible for the denial.

Thank you for your assistance on this matter.
Respectfully,

Carol McKinley

Monday, January 26, 2009

Faith Based Stalking





Washington Times Inside Blogotics

Faith-based stalking

We reported here last week about the arrest on prostitution charges, some involving the coercion of a minor, against a longtime liberal Catholic activist who was head of Ohio's Office on Faith-based Initiatives during 2007.

Catholic blogger Carol McKinley now asks about the timeline related to her blowing the whistle on Eric McFadden, who had a series of affiliations with liberal Catholic groups — Catholics for Kerry, the Catholic Alliance for the Common Good, and Ohio religious outreach for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's primary bid.

Mrs. McKinley wonders why Gov. Ted Strickland later brought Mr. McFadden onto the Clinton Ohio campaign and what was uncovered by any state investigation of Mr. McFadden's computer use.

"If your employee had a leadership problem in a dinky faith-based outreach operation, you wouldn't recruit him to run the Clinton/Strickland faith-based operation in the important state of Ohio, would you. … Strickland's staff certainly did not act upon what I provided them with because they were skeptical it was some kind of political ploy. They conducted their own investigation of his activities.

"Whatever Strickland's staff found … they shuffled him quickly out of the office for faith based initiatives. To say now that they were ignorant of any suspicious or threatening activity does not comport with the facts on record," she wrote.

It's common sense.




http://proecclesia.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-did-gov-strickland-know-and-when.html

the-american-catholic.com/2009/01/14/remember-catholics-for-kerry/

http://www.catholicreport.org/

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14857

http://chrisdickson.blogspot.com/2009/01/head-of-catholics-for-kerry-arrested.html

http://www.knarfoh.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=194

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Boston Mom Accuses McFadden's Previous Employers of Cover Up

.- A Boston-area Catholic woman is accusing a social justice group of ignoring her warnings that a former employee, who is now jailed under prostitution-related charges, was a danger to women. She also claims that she was threatened with a lawsuit if she made her accusations public, an allegation the group denies.

Carol McKinley, a Boston-area mother and national pro-life activist, told CNA in a phone interview that she first contacted Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good (CACG) during the first week of February, 2007 to warn them about harassing behavior by Eric McFadden.

McFadden, who was arrested January 14, 2009 on seven charges related to promoting prostitution, was in the midst of leaving CACG when McKinley first called to report the harassment.

Actually, when I first contacted them on February 4th - nobody mentioned that McFadden had resigned from CACG. There are no crystal balls at the McKinley abode, but I never bought that story, just as I don't buy it from Strickland's office. Even Kelley's own story supports the fact that McFadden left five days after I sent my first correspondence.

Alexia Kelley, the Executive Director of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, told CNA in an email that “Carol McKinley sent correspondence to our offices on February 5, 2007. By that date, Eric McFadden had already submitted his resignation. His last day as an employee with Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good was February 9, 2007.”

When CNA asked Kelley if McFadden exhibited any strange behavior that led to his resignation, she replied, “No he did not.”

See no evil, hear no evil.


According to McKinley, when she spoke with Kelley, she informed her of intimidating messages allegedly left by McFadden on her blog as well as emails sent from his personal email account.

There is no doubt in her mind, says McKinley, that the comments were left by McFadden because she would receive comments on her blog, and then on the same day, emails containing identical comments from McFadden’s personal email account.

Using tracking software on her website, McKinley was able to determine that she was receiving visits from the same IP address in Dublin, Ohio “nearly every five minutes.” On one particular day, she registered 82 visits from the Dublin address.

A copy of the email Carol McKinley sent to Kelley on February 5, 2007 detailed some of McFadden’s alleged rants and was obtained by CNA.

McFadden reportedly commented:

“Carol an other whack jobs come nowhere close to the message of love of Pope John Paul II. Do not soil his name by associating him with the heretic whack jobs. There is nothing Democratic here. It is the Republican Party that twists the life issue to fit its own sick agenda that is not in line with Church teaching. People like the witch Carol who aligned themselves with the Republican party have placed themselves in a state of excommunication and will be dealt with by Cannon law.”

“A law suit according to Cannon law has been filed. The heretic McKinley will be brought before the witches council for trial before the next full moon.”

Other messages, according to McKinley, accused her of being a “practicing lesbian” who donated to gay and lesbian groups and was not in accord with the Church’s teaching.

McKinley explained to CNA that, “I was extremely concerned that McFadden was victimizing other people, that his tone to me included strange sexual nuances and bizarre commentary that were the utterings of a very unbalanced man.”

However, McKinley claims that when she contacted Kelley, instead of addressing her concerns, Kelley retorted that Eric McFadden no longer worked for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and that if she made her allegations against McFadden public, she would be served with a lawsuit.

Kelley remembers the situation differently, saying she was alarmed to hear McKinley’s allegations, but that when she attempted to verify McKinley’s claims, she was unable to do so.

In hindsight, in light of McFadden's arrest and known behaviors, does this cause her to re-evalute the complaint made to her two years ago alleging McFadden was a predator?

She was "alarmed" that McFadden might be a predator but she invited McFadden and Patrick Whelan in their new initiative "Catholic Democrats"to take a leadership role in her 2008 how to vote for an abortionist Catholic Conference.

Two things of note in the above links, Patrick Whelan is frantically trying to erase any weblinks of Catholic Democrats that reference McFadden as his co-founder so you have to get that in caches - - and note McFadden's wiggy comment when NCR misplaces the crown of who's who in the Catholics for Kerry shtick. (n.b. Now that we know he was coming up for air from the back seat of his car between prostitute runs to post the comment, his notations about anyone elses "sex scandal" is tasteless.)

The Catholics in Alliance director also denied that anyone at her organization threatened to sue McKinley. “We said that we would refer the matter to our lawyer, one of whom she had already written on 2/5/07. We never threatened a lawsuit; and never said anything about her going public or not.”

McKinley remains adamant that her phone conversation with Kelley transpired differently.

“If McFadden tendered his resignation prior to February 5th, why would she take a complaint on February 5th against a former employee? Typically, employers will say ‘so and so is no longer an employee.’ I stand by my testimony. Alexia was rude to me, said Eric did a great job for them, that I was trying to destroy the reputation of a ‘good man’ and that I should brace myself for litigation if I pursued these allegations,” she said.

“I stand by my testimony. CACG protected and enabled Mr. McFadden and threatened the complainant. Laity needs to be held to the same standard as we hold priests and Bishops,” McKinley affirmed to CNA in an email.


Chris Korzen, Executive Director of Catholics United, was also a part of the conversation with McKinley since his organization is formally related to CACG.

Mrs. McKinley, who is employed as a legal assistant, claimed that Korzen would not give her an email address or a physical address for CACG's corporate lawyer so that she could notify the lawyer of the danger posed by McFadden.

CNA contacted Korzen on Monday, but he said that he did not have any information that would be useful and would not speak on record about the allegations.

During the course of her correspondence with Korzen, McKinley said that she had explained how in the summer of 2006 she contacted the police department in Columbus, Ohio because she was afraid McFadden’s words would turn into physical retaliation.

The Columbus police, McKinley said, told her that she would have to deal with McFadden locally by taking out a restraining order against him at the Boston Police Department. McKinley did not file a restraining order, reasoning that since she believed McFadden to be “criminally insane,” and that it would only make him “all the more dangerous.”


This cover up for her enabling a predator pretty much sews up whether her story is credible:

As far as Catholics in Alliance is concerned, the allegations against McFadden were out of their court once McKinley called the police. Kelley explained to CNA in an email that, “we deferred to them as law enforcement authorities to conduct an investigation. However, Catholics in Alliance was never contacted by them.”

Read my letter to them again.

In it, I say that in the past, I had found McFadden's behavior so threatening that I had called the police, that I had decided at that I would be safer not to pursue that course of action. She knew my contact with her and the allegations I was making was not under any police investigation.

Kelley also adds that, “at no time” did anyone associated with CACG “instruct Mr. McFadden to communicate with Ms. McKinley in any way” and that they “would never condone such actions.”

That is a straw man's argument and doesn't comport with the laws.

When your business is about executing political strategy and you hire an employee whose political strategy is to threaten, send numerous and compulsive messages with concepts that are unhinged, with inappropriate and peculiar sexual nuances - whether you condone it or not is moot. That's the nature of her business. There's a little thing called negligent hiring and negligent supervision that actually holds the employers accountable for such things.

Like, when the taxi company hires a drunk and they drive into a tree on the way to airport.

Or when a Bishop ordains a pedophile.

“In any event, it is extremely unfortunate that such vitriolic exchanges took place. As Catholics committed to promoting the common good, we emphasize the need for individuals to debate their differences with civility and respect,” Kelley said.

Following his stint at Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, Eric McFadden was hired by Ohio Governor Ted Strickland to head up his Office for Faith Based Initiatives.

Meanwhile, McKinley continued to receive harassing messages, leading her to email Strickland's office on October 10, 2007.

A little more than two weeks after McKinley made contact with the governor’s legal counsel Christine Thompson, McFadden had his pay cut and was transferred to the corrections department on Oct. 28, 2007, where he coordinated volunteer and outreach efforts for the prison system's faith-based services. McFadden held that position until March 2008 when his position was eliminated as a part of budget cuts.

Keith Dailey, Gov. Strickland’s spokesman, told the Cleveland Plain Dealer that McFadden’s departure from the position was due to his struggle with the job. "This was a leadership position and after some time it became clear it wasn't a good fit and it wasn't working out." "It was a mutually agreed decision," Dailey said.

McKinley explains her motivation for trying to expose McFadden’s past actions is not personal payback for the continual harassment she and her children endured. “I want these organizations to be held accountable for covering up McFadden’s behavior,” she said, charging that his previous employers are acting like some Catholic bishops did when priests were accused of sexual abuse.

Here are the million dollar questions:

Do the records of his compulsive sex postings indicate they were made during work hours of his tenure at Strickland's office?

When Strickland's staff got my complaint with information suggesting McFadden was an internet stalker and most likely a dangerous predator based upon my experiences - did they look at his internet traffic from his work computer?

If you hire a predator and you are given notice he is a predator and you threaten the complainant, enable him or shuffle him to a prison or in spite of the fact that you think he stinks at faith-outreach leadership positions, hire him a few months later in a Presidential campaign where you are stumping for Vice President, it's time for "change we can believe in".


Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Holding lay people accountable for what they knew and when they knew it

I have been speaking with a few reporters who are gathering information to write about the knowledge I gave about Eric McFadden to Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Strickland's office starting in early 2007.

It's CYA time, and I suspect the one thing we are not going to hear as their response, is: "Yes, now that you mention it, we did have a credible accusation and we ignored it".

They're going to say they didn't believe it, which is exactly what laity, the press and a great many lawyers have been lambasting the Chanceries, Bishops and priests for, isn't it?

Saying "We didn't believe it" doesn't cut it when a 17 year old girl has been exploited, used and passed off to others to use.

In hindsight, now knowing McFadden's history of obsessions with pandering obscenities, sexuality, intimidation, threats and compelling a minor into prostitution - taking photos of her in his wife's car, might this cause them to re-evaluate the complaint made to them two years ago alleging he was a predator?

I've been thinking about Strickland's office story that it is a coincidence Eric left the faith-based office a day or two after I sent links to things Eric authored, IP addresses, direct quotes of Eric's and a summary of my fears he was a predator and McFadden left because he "couldn't lead a faith-based effort".

As I've said in a previous posting - that is nonsensical because Strickland rounded him up for faith-based outreach when he was running strategy with Hillary Clinton - in the important state of Ohio (in a campaign where he was the number one pick for VP).

Let's face it. After receiving my complaint, Strickland's legal and human resource team would not call Eric into the office and say "We got a letter saying you are weird and so we are letting you go".

They did their own investigation.

Considering my allegations that McFadden was doing his tormenting, threatening, sexual harassing, etc., via the internet - if they didn't call in the IT department and check out what kind of sites he was visiting, that would be a pretty serious negligence in investigation. Big brother watches, there is a recording of where you traffic.

I've been thinking something a commenter wrote in the comboxes:


A commenter posts below that he did some internet research on the names Eric McFadden was using to post his internet reviews of prostitutes.

It's hard to believe it's possible they were unaware of his double life and addiction to prostitutes just from what one can find if you search around and see how obsessive he was about it. That they were also warned by you, though, it's pretty damning.

I searched his name SullivantGuy and was taken to a still-active prostitution-review web site called USASexGuide (I assume this is a different site than the one he set up). In the Columbus, Ohio, section, McFadden can be seen obsessively posting his disgusting reviews for years! It actually appears that he was picking up hookers on an almost daily basis, and I saw that even other people posting on that site sometimes thought he was creepy and alleged he would be stalkerish to prostitutes.
Link here, but you probably don't wanna browse that stuff -- it's disturbing. It gives you a feel for why Columbus police are referring to him as the "guru" of prostitution in Columbus. He is someone with some severe problems, so severe I doubt they went unnoticed by Strickland's people.

With all the obsessive postings, I bet there's a trail of some he posted when he was supposedly at work at Strickland's office?

That would make it pretty damning that Strickland's office had the kind of evidence they had, along with a complaint - - - to shuffle him into a prison where inmates have a credibility problem when they bring forward an allegation of abuse? Giving him the promotion to do faith-based outreach for Hillary and Strickland's POTUS and VPOTUS campaign - - is all pretty disturbing.

According to the website the commenter found- under Broad Street guy, he posted 575 reviews. That's only one out of four persona. Sullivant Guy has 486 postings. Further, this site appears to be in addition to the site HE was operating. Some of those would appear to be during work hours and during his tenure at the Governor's office. The Governor is not going to reveal what they found, but certainly diligence and a spreadsheet of the months he worked for Strickland and dates/hours of his postings may get to an answer.

Here's a few I picked out...these need to check out with a calendar tomorrow but I'm betting some of them are work days?


08-16-07, 09:46

08-11-07, 09:22

08-04-07, 15:07
08-03-07, 10:19

08-02-07, 09:02

07-28-07, 09:04

06-10-07, 14:15


Just to give you an idea of how creepy this guy was, he appeared to be making hay with the whores several times a week and some of those were several times a day. He sure was an early riser, no pun intended, as he repeatedly claims the best time to get the ones who take a bath and have clean clothes was between 5 and 8 in the morning. He sometimes describes seeking service from several of them in succession before he scooted off to work. No wonder this guy didn't have time for daily Mass or the gym.

(Ok, I'm being catty...moving right along...)

I'm going to post a few soundbytes to show just how creepy this guy was.

Sounds like some of them were ducking him. There's one post that he says he has to take one of the woman's shoes or purse so she won't ditch him? I'm trying to redact the sex talk but I hope I don't miss some of the lingo. Please let me know if I do and I'll redact it.


1. Best looking SW - Earlier this year I met _____ around Broad and Centeral - Killer body - saw her a couple other times, then she went down hill fast. Got nasty real fast. There were a couple others I met this past year that were just down right hot, but never saw them again. Possibly one timers or passing through.

2. Best Body - For me right now - this nice ________ on the hilltop. ______ is a close second

3. Best **** talent - _______ - I know she is new, well at least to me --- but damn this girl has skills.

4. Best Attitude - Giving the prize to the new girl again.

5. Worst Looking - I don't stop for em, so I don't get to know their names.

6. Worst Attitude - If they display a bad attitude - out the door they go.

Worst Attitude change to better- don't mess with attitude

Best Attitude change to worst- Don't hang with em for that change

Best Looking to bad- I agree with ________ on ______ - I simply pass her by now. - but the ______ I am refering to is a faster and worse dive. ________ on the west side took a nose dive as well. Oh yeah - I think _________ in the short north went south quick as well.

Worst ** to Best- if they are that bad - I ususally forget their name and don't give em a second chance

*

Ran around the west side for a bit early evening yesterday. Saw some regular skanks. Did not meet anybody I was interested in. ________number now goes straight to voice mail. Oh well. I did see 3 SW's on the wall near the Clark Station on Broad in the Hilltop. One was a blonde, older - total skank. The other was a pudgy platium blonde - not attractive at all, and the third was a thin brunette who actually look cute from afar (they all do) Upon closer inspection, I found out her name was ______ - but her teeth were not so great looking....

As for hours - I have found the best lately and the times I have actually met and had a good time is early morning - 5:30am to about 8am.

Stay safe

*

The storms woke me up this morning - so I went out for an early morning drive. First I met _____ - I had digits for her from a Sr Member, but they had not been working. She is early 30s. Pretty face. Great service. Have new digits for her for Sr. Members only. Met her on Sully in bottoms.

It had been awhile since I had a ***************, and _______ did do a great job, but I was still in need of some more ********. So after I dropped her off, I cruised around a bit. I met ______. I reported on her a while back. A very nice person and great attitude. Kind of cute in a very ******* sort of way. She was very clean today and had put on some weight. Said she just got out. She provided outstanding service for the second of the day. Sadly - no digits for Pam. Met her on Broad in the bottoms....

I did pull up on one on sully in the hilltop - that was kind of cute - then she opened her mouth and she had like one tooth! Sorry - Told her I thought she was someone I knew and rolled on.
*

Also ____ makes good points below about not fronting funds for the "__________". You have to think, if she comes out and actually does get in your car - what she will bring with her. Now if you really must take the chance and it is a girl you know and "trust", still cover your butt. Make her leave something of value to her in your car. Like her purse, if she has one or her shoes. If she won't do that. Forget it. Also don't sit there and wait - drive around the block and come back in 10 or so. If you really want to see this girl, the promise of more funds and holding something value will most likely make her reappear. I don't suggest this for the monger new to the scence. Know what you are doing before doing something risky. In the case of _________, holding the purse and shoes did the trick, and even though the service was crappy...
*

Two Fer

Out Saturday night - met ____ by ________ on Broad. Short hair brunette. Great skills. This girl is always clean and showered with clean clothes.

Then saw _______at Westpark and Sully. She was cleaned up today as well and tells me that she is not pregnant as she thought.


I suppose these posts could be considered faith-based outreach while working for Strickland's office:


Posted By Sullivant Guy




OH BULL****T. Carter was in for 4 years - then you are telling me that 12 years of Reagan/Bush did nothing ....then 8 years of Clinton -and now 8 years of Bush and some how just the Democrats during that time did this..

Hope you have some boots on cause you are standing in some smelly s**t.

It is called Deregulation and it go worse because of the f***ing RETARD who is President. People voted for the ***hole because they thought they could drink a beer with him. Who wants Barney the drunk as President?

Dodd and Frank have only had those committees for the past two years = you act as if the Republican led congress prior to that had nothing to do with it.

The Democrats were unable to pass legislation as Bush blocked it for the past two years and the Republicans before that had their way - one party rule never works...

*


31 Similarities Between Hitler and President Bush

We all know that Glenn is a member of the Neo Con GOP -todays version of the Hitler Youth. :)

31 Similarities Between Hitler and President Bush....

When President Bush decided to invade Iraq, his spokesmen began comparing Saddam Hussein to Adolph Hitler, the most monstrous figure in modern history. Everybody was therefore shocked when a high German bureaucrat turned the tables by comparing Bush himself with Hitler. As to be expected, she (the bureaucrat) was forced to resign because of her extreme disrespect for an American president. However, the resemblance sticks--there are too many similarities to be ignored, some of which may be listed here.

1.

Like Hitler, President Bush was not elected by a majority, but was forced to engage in political maneuvering in order to gain office.




The 2008 Presidential Election

Posted By Sullivant Guy



For Retard Glenn

:) :) :)

This is all in good fun - you are great monger my friend - but a political retard. :)

Read on...

Bush and Hitler
Compare and Contrast



Reading through the thousands of posts, in consideration of how much time, focus and the spiritual nature of this addiction, saying there was no manifestation McFadden was a sociopath is simply not believable.