As many have pointed out, including our friends at Boston Catholic Insider, the facts contradict Obama's assertion that he characterized what happened in Benghazi as a terrorist attack on September 12th.
Sir, your pants are on fire.
Obama's narrative on September 12th went something like this: The Constitutional rights and freedom of speech of Americans to say that islam is a violent political science provoked people who just so happened to be walking down the street to fire the rockets and missiles they had in their pockets:
And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people. Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.
We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None.On September 13th,Hillary Clinton continued the narrative.
In fact, on September 24th, Obama was still carrying on with the charade when he went in front of the United Nations, blamed it on religious intolerance and said the future must not belong to those who slander Islam.
On September 25th, on an appearance with the daffy women on 'the View', Obama still refused to say it was a terrorist attack. Rather, he said 'it wasn't just' a spontaneous mob critiquing a youtube video. If Obama wants to talk about amnesia, dates and quotes on blaming Americans for a terrorist attack might come in handy for a final debate.
The CIA knew.
The State Department knew.
Yesterday, the President said his denial of 13 requests for more security in Benghazi, his poo-pooing of the warning that the embassy was going to be attacked, his attempts to force sharia law down the throats of Americans and apologies to the terrorists, the lies and the murders as 'not optimal' during his appearance on a comedy show with John Stewart.
Not optimal, he said, but the fix is in. National Security absolutely comes first in his mind and he's going to find out what's broken and fix it.
That's right. When he finds out he, Joe and Hillary are what's broken, he'll roll up his sleeves and let us all know exactly how he'll make decisions about protecting Americans for the next four years.
It was interesting to watch the talking heads in the mainstream media who carried on with the farce that Obama was on board a terrorist attack all along and shifted the audience to find something funny about keeping resumes of qualified women in binders.
It certainly wasn't the most sophisticated way of describing how his administration actively recruited women for open positions by storing resumes, but I didn't really get what was so funny.
What does Obama do with resumes of qualified women? Throw them away?
Why are Americans, especially women, laughing at that?
Furthermore, Obama wants employers to pay women as much as men for qualified positions but he does not do it himself. Romney should have at the ready the salaries of women compared to men employed at the White House.
That outta wipe the grins off of the faces of women swooning at this malarkey.
If the President and his admirers were as concerned about the Obama's aiding and abetting terrorists as they were big bird and what they perceive as a faux pas of collecting resumes of qualified women in binders for job openings, Chris Stevens and three other Americans would not have come home in a casket.
The Gallup has Obama sinking in the polls with Romney now seven points ahead. Maybe a lot of other American people don't find Obama and the mainstream media charades all that funny either.