Several days back, I reported that Al Kresta's producer sent me a nastygram saying the following:
Now that you have publicly stated that “I like Al Kresta and all - but he DOES coverup corruption by refusing to report the corruption” I’d like for you to point out instances of where the program has covered up corruption.
I explained to him that one cannot prove a negative but to review his archives and if a list of programs Al has done on episcopal corruption turns out to be bupkis, there is his evidence.
But then I thought it would be a good idea to offer him the opportunity to help Catholic's upset Bishop Soto's idea of resolving a priest who is giving sexual sadomasochist lessons as telling him to do it off of diocesan property.
He wrote back telling me maybe I ought to read Dave Armstrong and it will help me out.
Isn't he on tour with the nuns on the bus?
What could I possibly learn from a guy who is an "apologist" for Communion in the hand? We are not made from the same cloth. I didn't realize Al Kresta got his pearls of wisdom from that trough.
Since I hadn't read him for the last ten years, out of curiosity, I googled Dave Armstrong. Wow. There's a lot going on there.
Anyhoo, I don' think Al Kresta is interested in helping expose Bishop Soto's unacceptable resolution.
We all know the reasons why.