Showing posts with label Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good. Show all posts

Monday, September 6, 2010

"Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good"

A lot of fun buzz this week about the abortion lobbyists.

Jack Smith at Catholic Key Blog tracked down "Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good" and found it kaput.  Website stripped of staff members, phone disconnected, etc.

One of the founders of 'the catholics in alliance for the common good' was appointed to the Obama administration where abortion policies can be worked on at the highest levels of Health and Human Services.

The other founder was caught running a prostitution ring, including the prostitution of children and is now registered as a level 2 sex offender.

There was a handful of people behind the charade and with two of their most effective leaders gone,of course this initiative fell apart.

This leaves Chris Korzen and James Salt in charge of the Democratic National Party email list of dissenting Catholics with questions about what to do for the upcoming election.

The farce they are running now, "Catholics United" has pretty much been made radioactive and Bishops, priests teaching heresy and immorality as virtue to the people are afraid to be aligned with it.

The show needed a new name.

Chris Korzen has the big TADA!.  They are reinventing themselves as a news agency.

Korzen did not say when the news business will be launched or how it will be financed, but noted that one of the tasks of the new entity will be "reporting on the activities of CNA and EWTN."

Goodie!

After all, who would question the honesty and sincerity of this face:


The eyes sure are the windows to the soul, aren't they.

There's a way to use their initiative and their money as free advertising for our work while making them radioactive with our own initiatives so that the people who align with them are outed for their agenda.

Instead of CNA (Catholic News Agency), maybe Korzen and his cronies could be CAN (Catholic Apostate News)?

Or how about instead of EWTN (Eternal Word Television Network), they could be WTNE (Wisdom Termites Need Everyday).

Monday, February 23, 2009

Hell Hath No Fury Like The Feuerher

The new initiative "Catholic Advocate," whose goal is to expose politicians "who hide their pro-abortion record behind a smokescreen of faith," confirmed to CNA that they do have the support of Senator Sam Brownback for their initiative.

But on Friday, Joe Feuerher, a staff writer of the National Catholic Reporter, questioned the authenticity of the letter, quoting Brownback's spokesman Brian Hart, who said that "our chief of staff ... had never seen, heard of, or approved it."

On Monday, Catholic Advocate sent CNA a copy of the email approving the letter from Senator Brownback. The email, which involves the names of other individuals not relevant to the story, was dated February 29, 2008 to Matt Schenk, of HSP Direct, clearly stating that "the Brownback/Catholic Advocate appeal" was "ok, approved."

Regarding the statements of Brian Hart quoted by the Reporter, Glen Chambers, chief of staff for Senator Brownback, explained that "I think we've gotten to the bottom of the confusion over the mail piece. Neither the Senator nor I had seen the letter or were aware of it. I figured out that you did get permission to use his name on the piece from a former campaign staffer in February of last year." Chambers also said there would not be future mailings using the Senator's name.

The CNA story also gives credence to the character assassinations that are reserved for Catholics who assent to the authority of the Deposit of Faith.

In the his story, Feuerher takes special aim at Deal Hudson, whom he describes as a "conservative Catholic activist and Republican political operative." Feuerher dedicates part of his article to focusing attention on his own controversial report from 2004 that detailed an inappropriate sexual encounter Hudson had revealed and apologized for several years ago.

In 2004, Feuerher deflected criticism that his intention was character assassination by saying that he just followed "where the story led me."

Nevertheless, earlier this year, Catholic blogs called attention to the Hudson story by saying that the coverage the National Catholic Reporter gave to the scandal surrounding Eric McFadden was insufficient in comparison.

I love the Freudian slip in Feuerherd's name. Considering the sex scandals right under the noses of the National Catholic Reporter, I'm amazed they are so bold.

I wouldn't wish the despicable characters at the NCR crowd upon McFadden's family.

But, let's mark the occasion: There are obscene pictures of a minor taken in his his wife's car and plenty of lewd and lascivious sex details in the public domain that the National Catholic Reporter story didn't "take them".

Catholics United is never associated with the sexual criminal and pedophile they sent to five parishes in Ohio to "protect children". NCR has yet to ask the question as to whether the sexual socipath went inside of the parish building on the directives of the DNC and their cronies at "Catholics United".

Feuerherd did not respond to my question about about Kennedy initiating the story. I'm terribly sorry that Kennedy is sick and I pray for his health and his conversion. But, let's have the decency to be honest. There's never been any mention in the National Catholic Reporter of the Kennedy's canoodlings when he drove off the bridge and left the woman to die. The story never seems to "take them there" even when its the Kennedys using the resources of the National Catholic Reporter to intimidate.

There is an end to letting the proabortion lobby of the DNC use political terrorism at a periodical with the name Catholic on it.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

The plot thickens

-----Original Message-----
From: cmmckinley@aol.com
To: jfeurhard@natcath.org
Cc: ckorzen@catholics-united.org; jsalt@catholics-united.org; tfox@ncronline.org
Sent: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:27 am
Subject: comfirm/deny



Joe,

Did Senator Kennedy's Office initiate a phone call to you regarding this story?

Thanks.




-----Original Message-----
From: cmmckinley@aol.com
To: jsalt@catholics-united.org
Cc: ckorzen@catholics-united.org; jfeuerherd@natcath.org
Sent: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:17 am
Subject: shooting a flare across your bow

James,

I noted with interest your quote in the Amy Sullivan article:

"
James Salt, director of organizing for the progressive organization Catholics United, thinks the USCCB has been prodded into focusing on FOCA by misinformation from conservative groups. "These right-wing organizations are deliberately misleading people in order to stoke the culture war," says Salt. "They're using this as a fundraising tool, as a way to gain up their relevancy. And unfortunately, some of these groups have the ear of certain bishops."

"Certain Bishops"? That's a bit of an understatement when the entire Conference of Catholic Bishops is ramping up efforts to put pressure against FOCA. Obama made it clear he intended to garner support to pass FOCA as one of his top priorities and we have no intention of laying low while he does it. The pro-life community intends to vehemently oppose and resist this radical offense to the dignity of human life.

I also find it fascinating that the National Catholic Reporter picked up on the story and added their own twist of attack.I know how much you guys like "accurate information" and since there appears to be a loose cannon on Brownback's staff making the foolish error of throwing orthodox Catholics under a bus by giving Feuerherd inaccurate information, I thought it worthwhile to drop you a line to recount for you that my recollection was that when the Brownback letter was produced, it was done with Brownback's permission.

Since I've been building the case that your phony baloney Catholic Alliance/Catholics United shtick is working with the DNC and the proabort politicians in it and using the National Catholic Reporter as a tool to attack Catholics whose compass is faithful to the tenets of the Catholic Religion - - I'd like to know if a Catholic politician made a phone call to the National Catholic Reporter to initiate their story. I'm going to find out and when I do, I'm going to add it to the pile of evidence - along with your most recent salvo at Bishop Naumann. Keep firing away boys!

Good day to you sir!

Carol McKinley

p.s. My most recent posts may be of interest to you:


Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good.

Catholics United.

Fishwrap rots from the head down.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good Had Two Dogs in the Race

Deal Hudson posted a link to the Catholic Key Blog reporting new information On Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good.

This new revelation gives a whole new meaning to Catholics United "parish protection program" sending the sexually disturbed psychopath Eric McFadden to parishes in Ohio to chase prolifers around in parking lots. It was courtesy of Barack Obama. This only adds fuel to my conviction that the Democrats are setting up machines within the US Government to haze and threaten Catholics loyal to the compass of the Catholic Church.


Elizabeth Frawley Bagley is the board chair of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good. As reported here earlier, Bagley is anything but nonpartisan. In fact, she has given hundreds of thousands of dollars to the DNC and scores of pro-abortion Democrat politicians including Al Franken, Barbara Boxer, Claire McCaskill, Charles Schumer, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. She personally raised at least $350,000 for the Obama campaign and was a member of his national finance team according to an interview in the Nantucket Inquirer and Mirror.



....However, one day after the election, on November 5, Bagley sat for an interview on the internet broadcast Paltalk News. Host Gary Baumgarten introduced Bagley as the person "who was responsible for getting out the Catholic vote for Obama," - a claim she did not deny. In his synopsis of the show, Baumgarten also describes Bagley as "an official of the Barack Obama campaign."


Eric McFadden's inability to restrain his genitalia, wasn't his only restraint problem. He also had trouble restraining his tongue. He would openly say that his stalking and threats were backed by Nancy Pelosi, Hillary and Bill Clinton, Ted Strickland, Burns Strider, who were all poised to publicly assassinate the character and mission of prolife Catholics by way of plotted attacks of intimidation using government agencies, blogs,the media and other methods of retaliation.

God O Thunder would claim to be invincible and backed by the DNC.

Hillary certainly gave McFadden's claim veracity.

Hillary herself:


At a convention of left-wing bloggers last summer, Hillary Clinton announced, “We are . . . putting together a network in the blogosphere.”

Her remarks became public only three weeks ago, on Oct. 2, when an anonymous person posted a shaky, hand-held videotape of her speech on YouTube. In it, Hillary bragged that she had helped create “institutions” which had produced a left-wing “network in theblogosphere” capable of “matching” the alleged “advantage of the other side.”
They called their "institution" the "Faith Working Group". The Democrats had Alexia operating Obama's "faith" machine and "Catholics United" operated Hillary's. Both Groups are part and parcel of "Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good". They had two dogs in the race.


The Democrat's "Faith Working Group", was indeed led by none other than Ms. Pelosi:



Burns Strider, one of the Democratic Party’s leading strategists on winning over evangelicals and other values-driven voters, will join Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) as she prepares to launch her 2008 presidential campaign.

Strider now heads religious outreach for the House Democratic Caucus, and is the lead staffer for the Democrats’ Faith Working Group, headed by incoming Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.).


Burns Strider blabbed about the group here.

We have direct lines to the candidate. There's interaction; decisions are being made. The faith office is at the table every morning, fully integrated into the campaign. Faith work has to be substantive, it has to be real in people's lives and it has to be taken seriously."

The Democrats know that they can win when they talk about their faith. The evidence was in the 2006 midterm elections when some Democratic candidates made their faith an important part of their platform.

Strider says, "We did it with Heath Shuler, Ted Strickland, Bob Casey, Tim Kaine and others by talking about their faith and no one turned into a pillar of salt. We have showcased the last few years that being authentically Democratic and authentically faithful is not only compatible, but powerful. All of these Democratic candidates are authentic and that's a good thing for our nation."

I'm all the more convinced they were all "sitting around the table" with "direct lines to the candidates" right at Ted Strickland's office and McFadden was using the resources of the State of Ohio to execute their plans.

The machine was and is well greased by the money from George Soros and the DNC.

It turns out that after I asked Strickland's legal team to check out McFadden's computer and they temporarily protected McFadden, the infamous Helen Jones-Kelley signed McFadden's "transfer". (I don't think that's going to play out to Strickland's advantage when I send my file to the OIG?)

Here's the kicker:

"Our practice is when someone is thrust quickly into the public spotlight, we often take a look" at them, Jones-Kelley said, citing a case where a lottery winner was found to owe past-due child support. "Our practice is to basically look at what is coming our way."

This from a woman who involved herself in shuffling Eric McFadden's after I filed a complaint about his computer diddlings.

When Strickland stumped for the job of Hillary Clinton's VP, he plucked McFadden out of the safety net and put the "Sullivant Guy" (McFadden) into a key role in the Democratic "Faith-Based Initiatives".


With the latest news that radical in-love-with-abortion Kathleen Sebelius is being tapped for Obama's Health and Human Services Chief, Catholics are publicizing Sebelius's abortion agenda and Soros and the DNC continue to fire salvos by way of the useful idiots at Catholics United.

“Had Mr. Donohue been interested in presenting a full accounting of the facts, he would have mentioned Gov. Sebelius's tireless support for children's health care and education, and her efforts to provide public financing for adoption and pregnancy support centers – all components of an effective pro-life agenda that can find broad support among the American people. Had Mr. Donohue been interested in presenting a full accounting of the facts, he would have mentioned that the number of abortions in Kansas declined by 12.6% from 2001 to 2007, due in part to Gov. Sebelius's advocacy for pregnant women and struggling families.”

“Like Kansas City Archbishop Joseph Naumann – who often seems more interested in scoring political points against Gov. Sebelius than crafting effective abortion policy within the reality of politics – Mr. Donohue is doing a disservice to those Americans who will benefit from Gov. Sebelius's leadership as Health and Human Services Secretary. We remind U.S. Catholics and other observers that the Catholic League is part of a right-wing political movement at the margins of the Catholic community, and urge them to view Mr. Donohue and his comments in this context.”


“None of these archbishops overreacted. Not only does Sebelius support the now outlawed practice of killing babies who are 80 percent born, so-called partial-birth abortion, she has accepted donations from one of the most notorious practitioners of this Nazi-style act—Dr. George Tiller. Moreover, she even hosted a dinner for him in the Governor’s Mansion.

Tiller has no shame for his executions - he readily admits he's killing a baby and he's graciously arrange for the baptism of the dead in one fell swoop:

“Tiller knows exactly what he is doing. On his website, he cites that one of the ‘Three Rules of the Practice’ of late-term abortion care is ‘Time, patience, and the baby will come.’ (His italics.) The baby will come?

“I’ve saved the best for last. Tiller’s Women’s Health Care Services advertises a chaplaincy program that provides ‘sacraments such as baptism of the still born [sic] fetus and blessings for the aborted fetus.’ Yet no one—including Tiller—offers baptism or blessings for shoes or salamanders. Just kids. We called and asked why the distinction between the baptism for the stillborn and blessings for the aborted baby. Chaplain Diane Warren just laughed and said they would do whatever was requested. But of course—it’s all about choice! The kind of choice that Sebelius loves.”

Don't miss this link from the American Papist. Laying claim that social justice and wider access to abortion decreases - under Sebelius the abortion cheerleader, abortions increased:

update: thank you to the readers who have left comments and emailed me. Steven Ertelt of LifeNews:

Catholics United also claims abortions have declined under Sebelius, even though they actually went up 6.5 percent in 2006 thanks in part to Sebelius failing to support any abortion limits.

According to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment report, there were 11,221 abortions in Kansas in 2006, up from 10,543 abortions in 2005.

Pro-life groups say the increase has to do with a lack of enforcement of laws limiting late-term abortions and a court's decision to drop 30 misdemeanor charges against Tiller, who has been accused of doing the abortions without a legitimate medical reason.


Thursday, February 12, 2009

More Lies Surface in Catholics in Alliance for Common Good Shtick

2009 is not going to be a good year for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good.

Somebody has blown a hole through the "study" they used to mislead Catholics.

The old version of the report was removed from the site in November 2008 after critics pointed out problems with the study.

“The new version provides evidence that welfare policy has no more than a marginal effect on the incidence of abortion,” he argued. “In fact, the new regression results indicate that none of the three welfare policies which the authors previously argued were effective tools for reducing the incidence of abortion have a substantial abortion reducing effect.”

According to New, the new regression results indicate that the presence of family caps limiting the number of children eligible for additional welfare benefits “has only a marginal effect” on state abortion rates.

New argued that the report’s statistical results are not consistent across time.

He also criticized the report’s finding that parental involvement laws and other state laws restricting abortion have little impact on overall abortion rates.

“Since parental involvement laws only directly affect minors, Wright should have mentioned that analyzing their effects on the overall abortion rate is not a methodologically sound way to gauge their actual impact,” New wrote.

The argument that informed consent laws are ineffective, New claimed, fails to acknowledge the “substantial differences” in the effects of informed consent laws that have been enacted and those that have been nullified. By the report’s criteria, New argued, the results provide evidence that informed consent laws are effective.

MoralAccountability.com has Kmiec, Cafardi and the Alliance megalomaniacs in an awful bind.

Unfortunately, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good continues to miss the boat and mislead the public. There exist plenty of peer reviewed studies which find that public funding restrictions and parental involvement laws reduce the incidence of abortion. However, instead of acknowledging the positive impact of pro-life legislation and constructively working with pro-lifers to promote social policies that will further reduce abortion rates, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good seems primarily interested in providing moral, political, and theological cover for supporters of Barack Obama and other Democrats who support “abortion rights.” Unfortunately, their latest study indicates that their original findings have been unable to withstand serious scrutiny.


Do read through the posts on their website.

You'd have to be mentally impaired to think five hundred dollars a month from welfare is going to impact a woman contemplating abortion.

If you want to live in a home, have food on the table, heating oil in the tank, clothes, a car to transport for your needs - welfare would have to pony up to 50 thousand a year before money was scratched off the list of obstacles overcome.

It isn't the money. People have been lied to. Nobody in their right mind would kill their own child, anymore than they would take a slave. It's a lack of a moral compass.

It's the sacrifice and hard work.

It's women who don't want a lifetime reminder of sleeping with irresponsible man or a stranger.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

More Chronicles of McFadia

There are some ongoing Developments in the Curious Case of Eric McFadden.

Tom Blumer at Newsbusters throws this question out there:

Given McFadden's heavy use of technology to to conduct his criminal enterprise, has anybody at the Dispatch investigated whether McFadden ever used state resources (telephones, Internet, etc.) while he was employed? Have any Freedom of Information Act requests been filed for all electronic and printed correspondence relating to the McFadden's appointment, his tenure at OFBCI, the circumstances surrounding his transfer to Corrections, or the end of his employment? If not, why not?

It's more than fair to ask what Ted Strickland or other state officials really knew about McFadden, and when they knew it.

Pursuant to this suggestion, I will be filing a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act to ask for information surrounding McFadden's tenure and departure - including copies of all communications and files relating to my complaint that McFadden was a dangerous person & using the internet as his main resource, any actions they took to investigate the legitimacy of my complaint - including and especially IT records of his internet traffic and pertinent emails while using his office computer in Strickland's faith-based offices.

When somebody lodges a complaint that your employee is using the internet to compulsively sexually harass and stalk in a manner that is intended to be threatening, the employer would call their IT department to check the history of his internet traffic.

Not to do so would be negligence. I've said all along - they went from not believing me to removing McFadden within days. They did an investigation and they found something.

Why was this man shuffled to a prison and then brought back into politics to do faith-based outreach for Ted Strickland and Hillary Clinton? Especially in light of the fact that they are trying to claim they fired him because he stunk at it.

Their story doesn't gel.

I suspect there is more to this than Mcfadden's various Sex Consumer Review Initiatives to direct traffic to a Brewery District Brothel.

Among his prostitutes was a 17 year-old girl whom McFadden met on Craig's list. He groomed her, took provocative and obscene photos of her & promoted her career.

Could it be possible that the tentacles of the money and sex are in some way wrapped around the rope and perks they gave McFadden?

Could McFadden have pimped out the teenager to some highly placed political people who then felt they needed to keep McFadden happy and employed to cover their gluteus maximus?

Seems to me the Democratic political establishment was keeping him employed no matter how egregious or lethal his conduct became.

For instance, it's a well-known story in the Ohio prostitute world that in 2006, during McFadden's employment with Catholics for the Common Good and prior to his employment in Strickland's office, a police report was filed by a woman claiming McFadden had kidnapped her, held her hostage and then was harassing her by telephone.

Details from the Columbus Ohio police report include two charges:

1. Telecommunications Harassment
2. Kidnapping

- and summary narrative:

VICTIM ALLEGES THAT SHE WAS HELD AGAINST HER WILL AT LISTED ADDRESS (RED ROOF INN) BY LISTED SUSPECT, AFTER HE/SUSPECT MADE A APPOINTMENT WITH SAID VICTIM FOR A "PRIVATE DANCE". VICTIM FURTHER ALLEGES THAT SINCE SAID INCIDENT, THE SUSPECT HAS BEEN CALLING HER BY TELEPHONE AND HARASSING HER.

I believe April of 2006 was about the same time he escalated his stalking and harassing with me that precipitated my call to the Columbus police. He was on a roll.

If McFadden was so lousy at faith-based outreach why would they rehire him? Why would Robert Kennedy Jr and Kathleen Townsend be using McFadden as their Clinton operation base in Ohio?

There was also a mystery surrounding McFadden's peculiar and swift departure from his post-Hillary appointment on the Paula Brooks campaign. Has anyone contacted Brooks to find out whether his sex, stalking or conduct intended to threaten manifested itself in any way?

As soon as I get the FOIA request completed, I'll post it. Turnaround time for that is customarily three days.

Stay tuned for more details for McFadden's Catholic Common Good Initiatives.

By the way, take a good look at the photograph in this post of the Brewery Brothel District. The irony that he spent his career trying to claim his motivations were inspired by his zeal for social justice to help the poor does not go unnoticed.

+++UPDATE

I've been sent information that while under the employ of "Catholics United", Eric McFadden claimed Bishop Frederick Campbell had called McFadden in to terrorize:

I'm redacting information of the victims of "Catholics United" - but the following letter was sent to Fr. Pavone in an attempt to get help after being bullied by the sociopath & sex predator during a mail drop in the 2008 elections:

Dear Fr. Pavone:

I worked with the Catholic Coalition for McCain here in Columbus, Ohio.

Preparing for the Catholic Coalition Literature drop on Sunday, Nov. 2nd, we read with assurance that you had contacted Catholics United and indicated you'd consider legal action if prolifers around the country were prevented from exercising our freedom of speech on public access church parking lots.

The harrassment, intimidation and stalking many "teams" of prolifers in Columbus diocese experienced at the hands of Eric McFadden, a wayward Knight of Columbus - who started "Knights for Obama" was despicable and embarrassing to all of us.

Many of the women were shocked and shaken by his verbal threats, taking photos of them and their car license plates. He also physically blocked them in and prevented them from moving off the parking lot.

He will be charged in both Upper Arlington, Ohio and Columbus, Ohio (as it happened in churches in both cities) He claimed he worked for our bishop, Fredrick Campbell. He most likely was called by several of the priests because he seemed to keep showing up at several parishes that we had trouble with angry priests.

Two interesting revelations in this letter.

One, McFadden was under the employ of Catholics United.

Two, Bishop Frederick Campbell and some of the priests in his diocese were employing "Catholics United", and in fact a pimp and sexual predator to use threats and intimidating conduct to prohibit Catholics from distributing the teachings of the Church in parishes where wayward priests are misleading their flocks.

I'm trying to extract the names of the priests in the diocese from the victims to publish - as well as include in the paper trail I'll be sending to the USCCB

I'll also be calling contacting the spokesperson for the Bishop to let him know the kind of characters "Catholics United" uses to intimidate and threaten and let him know I intend on filing a formal complaint against him at the USCCB office for "protecting children". Not only does it sound like he didn't go through a CORI process, if he's willing to use thuggery of sexual sociopaths to silence adult faithful Catholics - I don't think children are very "safe" in his diocese.

In case I've not made it clear kind of character Bishop Campbell and his priests used, the following post from McFadden's sex reviews should clear up any confusion. The man was so sexually obsessed, he had sex with three prostitutes in one evening. I hope the priests didn't let McFadden use the rest rooms where children are vulnerable:


Rainy Sunday Night Threesome

Damn - where to begin. I am not sure what got into me tonight - I have not done this in years....

I am on my way home from a friends - and found myself on W. Broad around 6:00pm - imagine that - sooo It is raining cats and dogs - so I figure not much out- right? WRONG - I see this tall girl on W. Broad and Richardson - basically a fatty -about 5'10 or so - says her name is _____ - 21 - she is cute though and has long hair - so I figure - not really up to my standards, but I got a big load built up that needs deposited - so she goes for a Jackson, so good news for the bargain hunters and we do the need -CBJCIM nearby - I dropped her off near Wilson and Broad. - she has digits. Great - however I am feeling tad bit horny still - sooo

I drive around a bit - see some skanks here and there - saw Ashleigh down in the bottoms - the bottoms _________ - but I had her not long ago and am looking for something else - then around 7:30pm I see __________ - she is about 5'5, long black hair curly. Cute face - says 26 yrs -She was near Broad and Avondale. so she gets a bit naked for me - has some nice little t**ties and a nice *ss to play with - we go to my favorite spot and another CIM. Dropped her off at Sully and Dakota. She has digits

I am still a bit antsy - not sure why - drive around a bit more - see some BSWs and some more skanks - then I pop up on these three WSWs behind Wendys near Central around 9:15pm- I did not get good looks at the others - because the one was WOW - turns out her name is _______ - 19 - about 5'8 red hair , nice firm D cups - awesome *ss - just a nice tight 19 year old body - dressed nice, nice skin and smells good - so I figure what the f*ck - and off we go - turns out she remembers me and I remember her now - I reported on her last summer - she went by ____ then - I think that is her real name- she was dressed a bit skimpier then. Off to my favorit place - she has a great box and let me play with it - sucked on this nice melon size firm natural t*ts for a...

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Boston Mom Accuses McFadden's Previous Employers of Cover Up

.- A Boston-area Catholic woman is accusing a social justice group of ignoring her warnings that a former employee, who is now jailed under prostitution-related charges, was a danger to women. She also claims that she was threatened with a lawsuit if she made her accusations public, an allegation the group denies.

Carol McKinley, a Boston-area mother and national pro-life activist, told CNA in a phone interview that she first contacted Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good (CACG) during the first week of February, 2007 to warn them about harassing behavior by Eric McFadden.

McFadden, who was arrested January 14, 2009 on seven charges related to promoting prostitution, was in the midst of leaving CACG when McKinley first called to report the harassment.

Actually, when I first contacted them on February 4th - nobody mentioned that McFadden had resigned from CACG. There are no crystal balls at the McKinley abode, but I never bought that story, just as I don't buy it from Strickland's office. Even Kelley's own story supports the fact that McFadden left five days after I sent my first correspondence.

Alexia Kelley, the Executive Director of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, told CNA in an email that “Carol McKinley sent correspondence to our offices on February 5, 2007. By that date, Eric McFadden had already submitted his resignation. His last day as an employee with Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good was February 9, 2007.”

When CNA asked Kelley if McFadden exhibited any strange behavior that led to his resignation, she replied, “No he did not.”

See no evil, hear no evil.


According to McKinley, when she spoke with Kelley, she informed her of intimidating messages allegedly left by McFadden on her blog as well as emails sent from his personal email account.

There is no doubt in her mind, says McKinley, that the comments were left by McFadden because she would receive comments on her blog, and then on the same day, emails containing identical comments from McFadden’s personal email account.

Using tracking software on her website, McKinley was able to determine that she was receiving visits from the same IP address in Dublin, Ohio “nearly every five minutes.” On one particular day, she registered 82 visits from the Dublin address.

A copy of the email Carol McKinley sent to Kelley on February 5, 2007 detailed some of McFadden’s alleged rants and was obtained by CNA.

McFadden reportedly commented:

“Carol an other whack jobs come nowhere close to the message of love of Pope John Paul II. Do not soil his name by associating him with the heretic whack jobs. There is nothing Democratic here. It is the Republican Party that twists the life issue to fit its own sick agenda that is not in line with Church teaching. People like the witch Carol who aligned themselves with the Republican party have placed themselves in a state of excommunication and will be dealt with by Cannon law.”

“A law suit according to Cannon law has been filed. The heretic McKinley will be brought before the witches council for trial before the next full moon.”

Other messages, according to McKinley, accused her of being a “practicing lesbian” who donated to gay and lesbian groups and was not in accord with the Church’s teaching.

McKinley explained to CNA that, “I was extremely concerned that McFadden was victimizing other people, that his tone to me included strange sexual nuances and bizarre commentary that were the utterings of a very unbalanced man.”

However, McKinley claims that when she contacted Kelley, instead of addressing her concerns, Kelley retorted that Eric McFadden no longer worked for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and that if she made her allegations against McFadden public, she would be served with a lawsuit.

Kelley remembers the situation differently, saying she was alarmed to hear McKinley’s allegations, but that when she attempted to verify McKinley’s claims, she was unable to do so.

In hindsight, in light of McFadden's arrest and known behaviors, does this cause her to re-evalute the complaint made to her two years ago alleging McFadden was a predator?

She was "alarmed" that McFadden might be a predator but she invited McFadden and Patrick Whelan in their new initiative "Catholic Democrats"to take a leadership role in her 2008 how to vote for an abortionist Catholic Conference.

Two things of note in the above links, Patrick Whelan is frantically trying to erase any weblinks of Catholic Democrats that reference McFadden as his co-founder so you have to get that in caches - - and note McFadden's wiggy comment when NCR misplaces the crown of who's who in the Catholics for Kerry shtick. (n.b. Now that we know he was coming up for air from the back seat of his car between prostitute runs to post the comment, his notations about anyone elses "sex scandal" is tasteless.)

The Catholics in Alliance director also denied that anyone at her organization threatened to sue McKinley. “We said that we would refer the matter to our lawyer, one of whom she had already written on 2/5/07. We never threatened a lawsuit; and never said anything about her going public or not.”

McKinley remains adamant that her phone conversation with Kelley transpired differently.

“If McFadden tendered his resignation prior to February 5th, why would she take a complaint on February 5th against a former employee? Typically, employers will say ‘so and so is no longer an employee.’ I stand by my testimony. Alexia was rude to me, said Eric did a great job for them, that I was trying to destroy the reputation of a ‘good man’ and that I should brace myself for litigation if I pursued these allegations,” she said.

“I stand by my testimony. CACG protected and enabled Mr. McFadden and threatened the complainant. Laity needs to be held to the same standard as we hold priests and Bishops,” McKinley affirmed to CNA in an email.


Chris Korzen, Executive Director of Catholics United, was also a part of the conversation with McKinley since his organization is formally related to CACG.

Mrs. McKinley, who is employed as a legal assistant, claimed that Korzen would not give her an email address or a physical address for CACG's corporate lawyer so that she could notify the lawyer of the danger posed by McFadden.

CNA contacted Korzen on Monday, but he said that he did not have any information that would be useful and would not speak on record about the allegations.

During the course of her correspondence with Korzen, McKinley said that she had explained how in the summer of 2006 she contacted the police department in Columbus, Ohio because she was afraid McFadden’s words would turn into physical retaliation.

The Columbus police, McKinley said, told her that she would have to deal with McFadden locally by taking out a restraining order against him at the Boston Police Department. McKinley did not file a restraining order, reasoning that since she believed McFadden to be “criminally insane,” and that it would only make him “all the more dangerous.”


This cover up for her enabling a predator pretty much sews up whether her story is credible:

As far as Catholics in Alliance is concerned, the allegations against McFadden were out of their court once McKinley called the police. Kelley explained to CNA in an email that, “we deferred to them as law enforcement authorities to conduct an investigation. However, Catholics in Alliance was never contacted by them.”

Read my letter to them again.

In it, I say that in the past, I had found McFadden's behavior so threatening that I had called the police, that I had decided at that I would be safer not to pursue that course of action. She knew my contact with her and the allegations I was making was not under any police investigation.

Kelley also adds that, “at no time” did anyone associated with CACG “instruct Mr. McFadden to communicate with Ms. McKinley in any way” and that they “would never condone such actions.”

That is a straw man's argument and doesn't comport with the laws.

When your business is about executing political strategy and you hire an employee whose political strategy is to threaten, send numerous and compulsive messages with concepts that are unhinged, with inappropriate and peculiar sexual nuances - whether you condone it or not is moot. That's the nature of her business. There's a little thing called negligent hiring and negligent supervision that actually holds the employers accountable for such things.

Like, when the taxi company hires a drunk and they drive into a tree on the way to airport.

Or when a Bishop ordains a pedophile.

“In any event, it is extremely unfortunate that such vitriolic exchanges took place. As Catholics committed to promoting the common good, we emphasize the need for individuals to debate their differences with civility and respect,” Kelley said.

Following his stint at Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, Eric McFadden was hired by Ohio Governor Ted Strickland to head up his Office for Faith Based Initiatives.

Meanwhile, McKinley continued to receive harassing messages, leading her to email Strickland's office on October 10, 2007.

A little more than two weeks after McKinley made contact with the governor’s legal counsel Christine Thompson, McFadden had his pay cut and was transferred to the corrections department on Oct. 28, 2007, where he coordinated volunteer and outreach efforts for the prison system's faith-based services. McFadden held that position until March 2008 when his position was eliminated as a part of budget cuts.

Keith Dailey, Gov. Strickland’s spokesman, told the Cleveland Plain Dealer that McFadden’s departure from the position was due to his struggle with the job. "This was a leadership position and after some time it became clear it wasn't a good fit and it wasn't working out." "It was a mutually agreed decision," Dailey said.

McKinley explains her motivation for trying to expose McFadden’s past actions is not personal payback for the continual harassment she and her children endured. “I want these organizations to be held accountable for covering up McFadden’s behavior,” she said, charging that his previous employers are acting like some Catholic bishops did when priests were accused of sexual abuse.

Here are the million dollar questions:

Do the records of his compulsive sex postings indicate they were made during work hours of his tenure at Strickland's office?

When Strickland's staff got my complaint with information suggesting McFadden was an internet stalker and most likely a dangerous predator based upon my experiences - did they look at his internet traffic from his work computer?

If you hire a predator and you are given notice he is a predator and you threaten the complainant, enable him or shuffle him to a prison or in spite of the fact that you think he stinks at faith-outreach leadership positions, hire him a few months later in a Presidential campaign where you are stumping for Vice President, it's time for "change we can believe in".


Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Holding lay people accountable for what they knew and when they knew it

I have been speaking with a few reporters who are gathering information to write about the knowledge I gave about Eric McFadden to Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Strickland's office starting in early 2007.

It's CYA time, and I suspect the one thing we are not going to hear as their response, is: "Yes, now that you mention it, we did have a credible accusation and we ignored it".

They're going to say they didn't believe it, which is exactly what laity, the press and a great many lawyers have been lambasting the Chanceries, Bishops and priests for, isn't it?

Saying "We didn't believe it" doesn't cut it when a 17 year old girl has been exploited, used and passed off to others to use.

In hindsight, now knowing McFadden's history of obsessions with pandering obscenities, sexuality, intimidation, threats and compelling a minor into prostitution - taking photos of her in his wife's car, might this cause them to re-evaluate the complaint made to them two years ago alleging he was a predator?

I've been thinking about Strickland's office story that it is a coincidence Eric left the faith-based office a day or two after I sent links to things Eric authored, IP addresses, direct quotes of Eric's and a summary of my fears he was a predator and McFadden left because he "couldn't lead a faith-based effort".

As I've said in a previous posting - that is nonsensical because Strickland rounded him up for faith-based outreach when he was running strategy with Hillary Clinton - in the important state of Ohio (in a campaign where he was the number one pick for VP).

Let's face it. After receiving my complaint, Strickland's legal and human resource team would not call Eric into the office and say "We got a letter saying you are weird and so we are letting you go".

They did their own investigation.

Considering my allegations that McFadden was doing his tormenting, threatening, sexual harassing, etc., via the internet - if they didn't call in the IT department and check out what kind of sites he was visiting, that would be a pretty serious negligence in investigation. Big brother watches, there is a recording of where you traffic.

I've been thinking something a commenter wrote in the comboxes:


A commenter posts below that he did some internet research on the names Eric McFadden was using to post his internet reviews of prostitutes.

It's hard to believe it's possible they were unaware of his double life and addiction to prostitutes just from what one can find if you search around and see how obsessive he was about it. That they were also warned by you, though, it's pretty damning.

I searched his name SullivantGuy and was taken to a still-active prostitution-review web site called USASexGuide (I assume this is a different site than the one he set up). In the Columbus, Ohio, section, McFadden can be seen obsessively posting his disgusting reviews for years! It actually appears that he was picking up hookers on an almost daily basis, and I saw that even other people posting on that site sometimes thought he was creepy and alleged he would be stalkerish to prostitutes.
Link here, but you probably don't wanna browse that stuff -- it's disturbing. It gives you a feel for why Columbus police are referring to him as the "guru" of prostitution in Columbus. He is someone with some severe problems, so severe I doubt they went unnoticed by Strickland's people.

With all the obsessive postings, I bet there's a trail of some he posted when he was supposedly at work at Strickland's office?

That would make it pretty damning that Strickland's office had the kind of evidence they had, along with a complaint - - - to shuffle him into a prison where inmates have a credibility problem when they bring forward an allegation of abuse? Giving him the promotion to do faith-based outreach for Hillary and Strickland's POTUS and VPOTUS campaign - - is all pretty disturbing.

According to the website the commenter found- under Broad Street guy, he posted 575 reviews. That's only one out of four persona. Sullivant Guy has 486 postings. Further, this site appears to be in addition to the site HE was operating. Some of those would appear to be during work hours and during his tenure at the Governor's office. The Governor is not going to reveal what they found, but certainly diligence and a spreadsheet of the months he worked for Strickland and dates/hours of his postings may get to an answer.

Here's a few I picked out...these need to check out with a calendar tomorrow but I'm betting some of them are work days?


08-16-07, 09:46

08-11-07, 09:22

08-04-07, 15:07
08-03-07, 10:19

08-02-07, 09:02

07-28-07, 09:04

06-10-07, 14:15


Just to give you an idea of how creepy this guy was, he appeared to be making hay with the whores several times a week and some of those were several times a day. He sure was an early riser, no pun intended, as he repeatedly claims the best time to get the ones who take a bath and have clean clothes was between 5 and 8 in the morning. He sometimes describes seeking service from several of them in succession before he scooted off to work. No wonder this guy didn't have time for daily Mass or the gym.

(Ok, I'm being catty...moving right along...)

I'm going to post a few soundbytes to show just how creepy this guy was.

Sounds like some of them were ducking him. There's one post that he says he has to take one of the woman's shoes or purse so she won't ditch him? I'm trying to redact the sex talk but I hope I don't miss some of the lingo. Please let me know if I do and I'll redact it.


1. Best looking SW - Earlier this year I met _____ around Broad and Centeral - Killer body - saw her a couple other times, then she went down hill fast. Got nasty real fast. There were a couple others I met this past year that were just down right hot, but never saw them again. Possibly one timers or passing through.

2. Best Body - For me right now - this nice ________ on the hilltop. ______ is a close second

3. Best **** talent - _______ - I know she is new, well at least to me --- but damn this girl has skills.

4. Best Attitude - Giving the prize to the new girl again.

5. Worst Looking - I don't stop for em, so I don't get to know their names.

6. Worst Attitude - If they display a bad attitude - out the door they go.

Worst Attitude change to better- don't mess with attitude

Best Attitude change to worst- Don't hang with em for that change

Best Looking to bad- I agree with ________ on ______ - I simply pass her by now. - but the ______ I am refering to is a faster and worse dive. ________ on the west side took a nose dive as well. Oh yeah - I think _________ in the short north went south quick as well.

Worst ** to Best- if they are that bad - I ususally forget their name and don't give em a second chance

*

Ran around the west side for a bit early evening yesterday. Saw some regular skanks. Did not meet anybody I was interested in. ________number now goes straight to voice mail. Oh well. I did see 3 SW's on the wall near the Clark Station on Broad in the Hilltop. One was a blonde, older - total skank. The other was a pudgy platium blonde - not attractive at all, and the third was a thin brunette who actually look cute from afar (they all do) Upon closer inspection, I found out her name was ______ - but her teeth were not so great looking....

As for hours - I have found the best lately and the times I have actually met and had a good time is early morning - 5:30am to about 8am.

Stay safe

*

The storms woke me up this morning - so I went out for an early morning drive. First I met _____ - I had digits for her from a Sr Member, but they had not been working. She is early 30s. Pretty face. Great service. Have new digits for her for Sr. Members only. Met her on Sully in bottoms.

It had been awhile since I had a ***************, and _______ did do a great job, but I was still in need of some more ********. So after I dropped her off, I cruised around a bit. I met ______. I reported on her a while back. A very nice person and great attitude. Kind of cute in a very ******* sort of way. She was very clean today and had put on some weight. Said she just got out. She provided outstanding service for the second of the day. Sadly - no digits for Pam. Met her on Broad in the bottoms....

I did pull up on one on sully in the hilltop - that was kind of cute - then she opened her mouth and she had like one tooth! Sorry - Told her I thought she was someone I knew and rolled on.
*

Also ____ makes good points below about not fronting funds for the "__________". You have to think, if she comes out and actually does get in your car - what she will bring with her. Now if you really must take the chance and it is a girl you know and "trust", still cover your butt. Make her leave something of value to her in your car. Like her purse, if she has one or her shoes. If she won't do that. Forget it. Also don't sit there and wait - drive around the block and come back in 10 or so. If you really want to see this girl, the promise of more funds and holding something value will most likely make her reappear. I don't suggest this for the monger new to the scence. Know what you are doing before doing something risky. In the case of _________, holding the purse and shoes did the trick, and even though the service was crappy...
*

Two Fer

Out Saturday night - met ____ by ________ on Broad. Short hair brunette. Great skills. This girl is always clean and showered with clean clothes.

Then saw _______at Westpark and Sully. She was cleaned up today as well and tells me that she is not pregnant as she thought.


I suppose these posts could be considered faith-based outreach while working for Strickland's office:


Posted By Sullivant Guy




OH BULL****T. Carter was in for 4 years - then you are telling me that 12 years of Reagan/Bush did nothing ....then 8 years of Clinton -and now 8 years of Bush and some how just the Democrats during that time did this..

Hope you have some boots on cause you are standing in some smelly s**t.

It is called Deregulation and it go worse because of the f***ing RETARD who is President. People voted for the ***hole because they thought they could drink a beer with him. Who wants Barney the drunk as President?

Dodd and Frank have only had those committees for the past two years = you act as if the Republican led congress prior to that had nothing to do with it.

The Democrats were unable to pass legislation as Bush blocked it for the past two years and the Republicans before that had their way - one party rule never works...

*


31 Similarities Between Hitler and President Bush

We all know that Glenn is a member of the Neo Con GOP -todays version of the Hitler Youth. :)

31 Similarities Between Hitler and President Bush....

When President Bush decided to invade Iraq, his spokesmen began comparing Saddam Hussein to Adolph Hitler, the most monstrous figure in modern history. Everybody was therefore shocked when a high German bureaucrat turned the tables by comparing Bush himself with Hitler. As to be expected, she (the bureaucrat) was forced to resign because of her extreme disrespect for an American president. However, the resemblance sticks--there are too many similarities to be ignored, some of which may be listed here.

1.

Like Hitler, President Bush was not elected by a majority, but was forced to engage in political maneuvering in order to gain office.




The 2008 Presidential Election

Posted By Sullivant Guy



For Retard Glenn

:) :) :)

This is all in good fun - you are great monger my friend - but a political retard. :)

Read on...

Bush and Hitler
Compare and Contrast



Reading through the thousands of posts, in consideration of how much time, focus and the spiritual nature of this addiction, saying there was no manifestation McFadden was a sociopath is simply not believable.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

A Whole New Meaning to Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good

I've written to Tom Fox from the National Catholic Reporter whose story on McFadden has a quote from Catholics in the Alliance for the Common Good.

Should give a whole new meaning to catholic alliance for the common good, catholics united, Catholic faithful citizenship.


-----Original Message-----
From: cmmckinley@aol.com
To: tfox@ncronline.org
Cc: ckorzen@catholics-united.org
Sent: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:32 pm
Subject: McFadden and Catholics In Alliance for the Common Good

"Jennifer Goff, director of communications for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, told NCR that members of the organization were "incredibly saddened and shocked" by the news of McFadden’s charges and arrest. She said, "We are praying for anyone involved or harmed in this situation, and for Mr. McFadden and his family."

Tom,

I beg your pardon, but the above publicity statement indicating they are shocked and saddened that McFadden turned out to be a dangerous person to women does not comport with the facts.

In February of 2007, I communicated with Alexia Kelley, Chris Korzen and their attorney to bring to their attention McFadden's compulsive stalking conduct which was tinged with bullying and sexual nuances that were threatening enough that I made a phone call to the Columbus police - and I asked for them to intercede. I mentioned that I was very concerned that he may be victimizing others.


I have attached proof of my communications with them from February of 2007 making the dangerous person McFadden was known to them. I also had phone conversations with them during that time.
The Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, threatened me with a lawsuit if I divulged any such information and I was dismissed.

Stay tuned to my blog for updated details on my communications with them and with Governor Strickland's office, who is also misleading people into thinking they had never had any kind of notification of dangerous behavior and now they are shocked and saddened.

http://votingcatholicin2008.blogspot.com/

Victims of this man and the people who empowered him do not have to be afraid anymore.

Carol McKinley

By the way, Can you catch the sentiments of the organization McFadden ran with "Catholic Democrats" in their response:


Upon hearing of the arrest, the organization, Catholic Democrats reacted saying that it is “sad news” that a “committed Catholic Democrat” has been arrested under such accusations.

Is it me, or does this stink of implying the accusations are part of a right wing conspiracy against a committed Catholic lobbyist drummed up by the Republicans?

Even my own cynicism did not adequately prepare me for the disingenuous responses of these various characters.




***UPDATE

Didn't hear back from Tom Fox-but I did send him another email to let him know how compelling this story is and how important it is to Catholics to thoroughly weed out anyone who protects predators and threatens complainants. We do not put up with this with our priests and Bishops and we must not put up with it from lay organizations.


-----Original Message-----
From: cmmckinley@aol.com
To: tfox@ncronline.org
Cc: ckorzen@catholics-united.org
Sent: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 7:21 pm
Subject: re: Eric McFadden and Catholics in Alliance --comments posted on NCR site


Tom,

I hope you had a good weekend and I'm looking forward to touching base with you.

We don't let priests or Bishops get away with protecting predators and we must not let lay people get away with it.

I've added the below comments to your story and I would greatly appreciate an email back to me so that we can arrange to speak.

Carol McKinley





***************************************


Allow me to make myself perfectly clear.

The Catholic Alliance for the Common Good had information that they were employing and empowering a dangerous predator in February of 2007. Instead of doing something about it, they threatened the complainant.

This is outrageous conduct and conduct that we should hold them accountable for as Roman Catholics. There is a history that these individuals will protect a predator and threaten the person complaining about that predator.

Now McFadden stands accused of compelling prostitution of minors, along with other charges. Compelling prostitution, as in using threats and coercion. My letters made perfectly clear that McFadden was a time bomb and that I feared and had concern for victims in the future and I told them that they should have concern as well.

Since the National Catholic Reporter has given a platform to Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good in many of your stories, you have a duty to get out to your readers the internal corruption of this group and the dangers they present.

My letters to the Catholic Alliance for the Common Good regarding the dangerous person they were employing can now be found at the website below.


http://catholicandtestifying.synthasite.com/

I've written to Tom Fox and I do hope to hear from him regarding this situation.

Carol McKinley