Showing posts with label Eric McFadden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eric McFadden. Show all posts

Saturday, February 7, 2009

A Few Quick Updates on the Eric McFadden Story

Strickland's Office responded to my request.

I have only had the opportunity to quickly review it. I would say from that brief review that they provided me with the emails I sent them and their responses along with a letter from McFadden requesting a transfer to the prison (at that time on the outside of the bars) and two pages indicating McFadden's personnel change to the prison.

The responsive documents were accompanied by a cover letter that alleges they are under no obligation to provide me with information on what the Governor knew and when he knew it with respect to the predator I told them they were employing:

"Please be aware that part 2 of your request for "emails and internet traffic reports of Mr. McFadden's computer relating to sexual solicitation, implied or overt threats to those he philosophically opposed" generally fails to satisfy the requirements of Ohio public records law to specifically and particularly identify the records that you are seeking. under Ohio law, a requester has the duty to identify with sufficient clarity the records being sought from the public office. A governmental office has no duty to "seek out and retrieve those records which would contain the information of interest to the requester". State ex rel Fant v Tober, No. 6373l7, 1993 Ohio App. LEXIS 2591 at *4 (8th Dist Apr. 28, 1993); aff'd 68 Ohio St.3d 117 (1993). That is,, a public office is under no obligation to search for records containing selected information. State ex rel Thomas v. Ohio State university, 71 Ohio St. 3d 245 (1994).


That's a good one.

I'll appeal it, but essentially, they are staking their legal claim on the turf that when I made known to the Governor he was employing a sexually disturbed lunatic who was using the internet, whatever they found is not material of interest to my request. Considering McFadden wound up in jail under a 750,000 dollar bond because of concerns that he is a threatening predator along with revelations of compulsive postings on sex sites, some of which appear to be made on work hours during his tenure at Strickland's Faith Based Office - what's to be of interest, Strickland says.

If this is a country with some measure of separation of legal justice from partisan politics, I don't know how the case law they cite will hold up.

I want to know what they found when I made allegations and asked them to do their own diligence on McFadden's computer.

How can that be insufficiently clear, too broad to wrap their head around or immaterial to my request for information?

In October of 2007, I made known to the Governor:

a.) The Democrats were using thugs to internet stalk, threaten and silence Catholics evangelizing the authentic teachings of the Church in the public square and calling it "faith based initiatives" and give them links to their own monkey

b.) That my experiences with McFadden, on top of being stalked by him, included obsessive and inappropriate sexual comments which left me with the impression that he was an extremely dangerous person with some kind of malice against women manifesting itself sexually

c.) My request that they take the information I was giving them and run to his internet traffic reports from his computer at the "Faith-Based Initiatives Office" and see if that internet traffic led to anything problematic

Did a complaint come in to Strickland's legal team about McFadden's internet activities that made an allegation he was a dangerous person -- and they didn't investigate his computer for internet traffic?


Did they investigage & find something but then quickly shuffled him to to employment at a prison and they watched as McFadden was brought back into faith-based outreach on a campaign Strickland was stumping for as Vice President, and they said nothing?

Now that the world is aware of McFadden's compulsive sex addiction internet apostolate, what they found is legally protected from disclosure from a woman who blew the cuckoo predator whistle two years ago?

More later on that front.

On another front, Chris Korzen responded to my email about whether McFadden was ever on their payroll:

Dear Ms. McKinley,
Given the way you've treated my organization and me in the past (for instance, the incredibly un-Christian blog post in which you suggested that I look like a lizard), I'd be foolish to think we're going to get anything close to a fair shake in your "story."
The attempts by you and others to implicate Catholics United in any of Mr. McFadden's personal activities are a pitiful distraction from the challenges we face as a nation right now, and will ultimately prove fruitless. Mr. Fadden has never been on the Catholics United payroll.
Sincerely,
Chris Korzen




As a dutiful conservative gentleman pointed out, Korzen leaves open the question of whether McFadden was ever 1099'd. Apparently, as the co-founder of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and all it's subsidiaries, Korzen claims McFadden was never paid for his work. McFadden was doing it all for free.

If you believe that, Obama has a prolife homily to sell you.

I wrote back:


Considering McFadden has been affiliated and associated with Catholics United and all the other names you morphed into
- considering you circulated a “parish protection” letter threatening to send people to parishes to “intervene”
- considering McFadden showed up saying he was with Catholics United when he was taking pictures and threatening prolifers
- considering McFadden turned out to be the pervert and predator I blew the whistle on in February of 2007
Any reasonably prudent person victimized by you and your colleagues are not going to draw a distinction at this juncture – paid or unpaid – his name was on things written for your initiative, you gave him space on your websites and he carried out your orders.
Just in case anybody is interested in Catholics United trying to cut McFadden loose from their activities:

http://insidecatholic.com/Joomla/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Fr.-Frank-Pavone-Warns-Catholics-United-of-Possible-Lawsuits.html&Itemid=127

Below is a letter from Fr. Frank Pavone, president of Priests for Life, to the staff at Catholics United, including James Salt and Chris Korzen.

In his letter, Fr. Pavone warns Catholics United about possible lawsuit that may be filed by “any individual or institution who tries to intimidate or prevent citizens from fostering the electoral process or informing their fellow citizens about the candidates.”

Fr. Pavone is responding to the effort of Catholics United, described in the e-mail from James Salt, to organize a “parish protection program and join volunteers across the country who will be working to put a stop to the religious right's efforts this weekend.”

In other words, Catholics United wants to prevent pro-life Catholics from distributing voter guides to Catholics as they leave Mass on Sunday. (Note that CU has its own voter guide, which, by the way, is not pro-life.)

I laughed out loud when I read Salt describing Priests for Life as a "partisan group." Could he have written that with a straight face after the charade of the "non-partisan" Catholics United?

Letter from Fr. Frank Pavone to Catholics United, 10/31/08
James, Chris, and Team,
I received a copy of the email you sent out20(below). I don’t know if you attempted to speak with me before sending this out, but we would welcome such an approach in the future.
Please inform those to whom you communicate that they might also want to alert their pastors that a large number of people are ready to file lawsuits against any individual or institution who tries to intimidate or prevent citizens from fostering the electoral process or informing their fellow citizens about the candidates.
While we are not initiating any such activity, many people have told us they are ready to do so depending on what happens this weekend.
Pastors and dioceses want to avoid “legal entanglements,” and the activity you recommend here will get them entangled far faster than mine will.
Obviously, an email like the one you sent below would implicate you in such entanglements as well.
Best regards,

Fr. Frank Pavone
PS -- Thanks for the extra publicity! Please be sure to register for the November 5 teleseminar as well.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Blast E-Mail from James Salt of Catholics United, 10/30/08
--- On Thu, 10/30/08, James Salt, Catholics United <parishprotection@catholics-united.org> wrote:
From: James Salt, Catholics United <parishprotection@catholics-united.org>
Subject: Help Protect Catholic Churches from Political Manipulation
To:
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008 , 2:56 PM
Help Protect Catholic Churches from Political Manipulation
Dear ___,

With less than a week to go until Election Day, things are getting ugly. In a final act of desperation, the religious far right is calling on its activists to defy the U.S. Catholic Bishops' order to keep unapproved election materials from church property by doing a "literature drop" at parishes across the country. The goal of this activity is to convince Catholics that it's immoral to vote for candidates who don't subscribe to the right's narrow agenda.
It's true. On Monday the partisan group Priests for Life held a teleseminar to train some 3,300 activists nationwide on how to place divisive political literature on the windshield of every churchgoing Catholic's car this Saturday and Sunday.
Click Here to listen to Priests for Life explain how to distribute partisan literature on Catholic Church property.
Catholics United is spearheading an effort to put the brakes on the religious right's plans in as many parishes as possible. Here's what you can do to help:
* Call your pastor and encourage him to instruct the ushers to monitor the church parking lot during the worship service. This sample script lists some ways that parishes can protect themselves from undue political influence.
* Sign up for our parish protection program and join volunteers across the country who will be working to put a stop to the religious right's efforts this=2 0weekend. We'll then provide you with detailed information on how you can protect churches in your neighborhood.
* Print copies of our values voter guide and "Pro-Life Means All Life" flyer and pass them out at community and political events in your area. Please consult with your pastor before distributing these materials on church property.
The extreme right will stop at nothing to distort church teaching for political gain. It's time to say that enough is enough. Catholics are tired of our faith being used as a political weapon.

Sincerely,

James and Chris
The Catholics United Team


http://www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=91927





From McFadden's website:

http://eamon-matthew25.blogspot.com/2008/11/mccain-campaign-volunteers-trespass-at.html#links

This was by far the most obnoxious group we ran into all day. There were about ten volunteers fanned out across the parking lot of St. Michaels in Worthington, Ohio. Not only were McCain Campaign Volunteers trespassing on the Church lot, but also volunteers from Ohio Right to Life and The Ohio Christian Alliance. It was pure mayhem and apparent coordination between the McCain Campaign and outside groups.

We asked them all if they had permission from the pastor to be there. They all of course declined to answer that and instead told us they had a right to be there and exercise their free speech. We reminded them that they were on private property. They advised us if w e removed their fliers then it was "felony".

They became quite confrontational and would not leave when asked to politely. At one point, one of the gentleman began posturing as if he would get physical with us.

They reminded us that we were baby killers even though they new little else about us other than we were reminding them of their trespass and photographing it.

After they covered all the cars in the lot, they left. We then removed all of their fliers, sometimes two and three deep on the cars.

http://eamon-matthew25.blogspot.com/2008/11/mccain-campaign-volunteers-invade-and.html#links

T
hese ladies, volunteering for the McCain Campaign, were busy putting GOP paid for fliers on the cars in the private parking lot of St. Timothy's Catholic Church, when we pulled up.

They were a team of 6 and quickly fanned out to perform their unwanted partisan activity on Church property. When asked if they had the permission of the pastor to be there, they said they did not. They advised that they had the permission of "Catholics for McCain" to be there. We asked them if they wanted to go inside and ask the pastor and we even volunteered to go with them. We advised them that it was not the policy of the Diocese or the Catholic Conference of Ohio to distribute unofficial literature on Church property. We advised them that they were trespassing as well.

They quickly packed up and left only to park up the street, mayb e to wait us out. We waited with them for awhile and then they drove away.

http://eamon-matthew25.blogspot.com/2008/11/mccain-campaign-volunteers-trespassing.html#links

These McCain Campaign Volunteers trespassed on the property of St. Andrew's Catholic Church in Upper Arlington, Ohio this morning to place partisan and divisive campaign literature on cars of unsuspecting parishioners in the parking lot. In one of the pictures, one can clearly see the McCain Campaign Tee Shirts and hats.

When asked if the pastor of the Church had given them permission to be there, they said no. They were reminded that they were trespassing and that the Church had asked that only Church approved materials be distributed on Church property.

Not only were they handing out the McCain /GOP fliers but they also had fliers from the Ohio Christian Coalition. Apparently the McCain Campaign is coordinating its efforts with outside groups. tsk tsk

Their activities soon caught the eye of a special duty police officer there, normally for traffic duty. He advised them that the pastor had asked him to watch for trespassers distributing political materials this Sunday and to ask them to leave. He did so after making them remove the offending materials they had already placed. They removed their fliers and left the parking lot.

http://eamon-matthew25.blogspot.com/2008/11/mccain-campaign-politicking-at-st.html#links

Volunteers from the McCain campaign trespassed on the property of St. Brendan's Catholic Church in Hilliard, OH this morning and placed flyer's paid for by the Ohio GOP on parishioners windshields. The trespassers were gone when we arrived, but the evidence was left. We ran into a rather busy Church employee who was busy removing the offensive, divisive and partisan materials from the cars so parishioners could go home in peace after the sanctity of the mass.

Shame on the McCain campaign for bringing politics onto Church property this election season.

Volunteers from the McCain campaign trespassed on the property of St. Brendan's Catholic Church in Hilliard, OH this morning and placed flyer's paid for by the Ohio GOP on parishioners windshields. The trespassers were gone when we arrived, but the evidence was left. We ran into a rather busy Church employee who was busy removing the offensive, divisive and partisan materials from the cars so parishioners could go home in peace after the sanctity of the mass.

Shame on the McCain campaign for bringing politics onto Church property this election season.

Today in Columbus Ohio, we visited six parishes this morning. The McCain campaign had volunteers at all six parishes putting flyer's on cars, despite requests by the parishes and the dioceses not to. Below are some of the pictures - more to come soon with a full report on each parish.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Catholics United Parish Protection Program

-----Original Message-----
From: cmmckinley@aol.com
To: ckorzen@catholics-united.org
Cc: jsalt@catholics-united.org; parishprotection@catholics-united.org
Sent: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 1:29 pm
Subject: Catholics United Parish Protection Program

Dear Chris and Jim,

I'm preparing a story (and some actions) relative to your "parish protection" program in November of 2008. I appears that the Bishops and priests who gave your group permission to threaten and intimidate with a sexual psychopath (who then posted pictures and accounts of your group's activities) may actually be in some hot water.

It is my understanding that Mr. McFadden was on your payroll at the time of your executed "parish protections", a year and a half after I blew the whistle on this pervert and predator.

Do you care to confirm or deny on the record?

Sincerely,

Carol McKinley




Blast E-Mail from James Salt of Catholics United, 10/30/08
On Thu, 10/30/08, James Salt, Catholics United <parishprotection@catholics-united.org> wrote:
From: James Salt, Catholics United <parishprotection@catholics-united.org>
Subject: Help Protect Catholic Churches from Political Manipulation
To:
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 2:56 PM
Help Protect Catholic Churches from Political Manipulation
Dear ___,

With less than a week to go until Election Day, things are getting ugly. In a final act of desperation, the religious far right is calling on its activists to defy the U.S. Catholic Bishops' order to keep unapproved election materials from church property by doing a "literature drop" at parishes across the country. The goal of this activity is to convince Catholics that it's immoral to vote for candidates who don't subscribe to the right's narrow agenda.
It's true. On Monday the partisan group Priests for Life held a teleseminar to train some 3,300 activists nationwide on how to place divisive political literature on the windshield of every churchgoing Catholic's car this Saturday and Sunday.
Click Here to listen to Priests for Life explain how to distribute partisan literature on Catholic Church property.
Catholics United is spearheading an effort to put the brakes on the religious right's plans in as many parishes as possible. Here's what you can do to help:
* Call your pastor and encourage him to instruct the ushers to monitor the church parking lot during the worship service. This sample script lists some ways that parishes can protect themselves from undue political influence.
* Sign up for our parish protection program and join volunteers across the20country who will be working to put a stop to the religious right's efforts this weekend. We'll then provide you with detailed information on how you can protect churches in your neighborhood.
* Print copies of our values voter guide and "Pro-Life Means All Life" flyer and pass them out at community and political events in your area. Please consult with your pastor before distributing these materials on church property.
The extreme right will stop at nothing to distort church teaching for political gain. It's time to say that enough is enough. Catholics are tired of our faith being used as a political weapon.

Sincerely,

James and Chris
The Catholics United Team


(some of McFadden's links and photos)

http://eamon-matthew25.blogspot.com/2008/11/mccain-campaign-volunteers-trespass-at.html#links

http://eamon-matthew25.blogspot.com/2008/11/mccain-campaign-volunteers-invade-and.html#links

http://eamon-matthew25.blogspot.com/2008/11/mccain-campaign-politicking-at-st.html#links


Letter from Fr. Frank Pavone to Catholics United, 10/31/08
James, Chris, and Team,
I received a copy o f the email you sent out (below). I don’t know if you attempted to speak with me before sending this out, but we would welcome such an approach in the future.
Please inform those to whom you communicate that they might also want to alert their pastors that a large number of people are ready to file lawsuits against any individual or institution who tries to intimidate or prevent citizens from fostering the electoral process or informing their fellow citizens about the candidates.
While we are not initiating any such activity, many people have told us they are ready to do so depending on what happens this weekend.
Pastors and dioceses want to avoid “legal entanglements,” and the activity you recommend here will get them entangled far faster than mine will.
Obviously, an email like the one you sent below would implicate you in such entanglements as well.
Best regards,

Fr. Frank Pavone
PS -- Thanks for the extra publicity! Please be sure to register for the November 5 teleseminar as well.


For the record, McFadden, the criminal sex offender is now behind bars on a $750,000 dollar bond to protect the witness from McFadden's intimidation and coercion.

Catholics United used McFadden to take photographs of people's license plates in the Church parking lot. I think the victims have a decent civil suit against Catholics United, especially since I've got the paper trail on the whistleblowing over a year before the execution of this day of bullying.

More news on this story later.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Public Information Request regarding Eric McFadden

January 27, 2009


Via email


Kent Marcus, Esq.
Christine Thompson, Esq.
General Counsel, Gov. Ted Strickland
State Capitol
77 Sough High Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Dear Ms. Thompson and Mr. Marcus:
Please accept this request for information relating to a complaint filed by me in October of 2007 with Kent Marcus and Christine Thompson in Governor Strickland's Office of General Counsel that made allegations that Mr. Eric McFadden of the Governor's Office of Faith-Based Initiatives was a dangerous person - in particular to women. Mr. McFadden used internet resources to threaten, stalk, sexually harass – including using sexual terminology in a perverted and inappropriate manner, compulsively sent communications to me and to others, so numerous and consecutive, that their intention was to intimidate. I reported that given my experiences with Mr. McFadden I was very concerned he was victimizing others and in particular, women.

Within days of my complaint, Mr. McFadden was removed from the OFBI and transferred to the employ of State of Ohio Correctional Facility and shortly thereafter was appointed to Ms. Hillary Clinton's campaign - which Governor Strickland was deeply involve in and was rumored to be Ms. Clinton's first choice candidate for Vice President.

Given Mr McFadden's deranged and dangerous conduct to women, including sexual obsession and solicitation and compulsive obscene postings, compelling prostitution of a minor, pursuant to any and all applicable Freedom of Information and Sunshine Laws of the State of Ohio, I would like to obtain a copy of the following records:
1. Written and electronic communication relating to my complaint, including copies of my communications.
2. Written and electronic records, including actions taken to investigate my complaint, findings of any conducted investigation, emails and internet traffic reports of Mr. McFadden's computer relating to sexual solicitation, implied or overt threats to those he philosophically opposed, instructions to staff and employment decisions made based upon those findings.
3. A detailed written account of Mr. McFadden's hours of employment at the Office of Faith Based Initiatives that chronicles his days of attendance as well as any days he was absent, on vacation or used sick time as this is germane to match against his time and date stamped public postings on the web.
4. Any information relating to the decision to shuffle him into the employ of the corrections system.

I understand that if I seek a copy of this record, there may be a copying fee. Please inform me of that cost prior to making the copy. I can be reached at #XXX-XXX-XXXX or email at cmmckinley@aol.com.


According to the statutes, this request should be acted upon as soon as possible, but in no event later than the third business day following receipt of this letter. If access to the records I requested is going to take longer, please contact me so we can work out a reasonable date.

If you choose to deny the request, then you are required to respond in writing and state the statutory exception authorizing the withholding of all or part of the public record and the name and title or position of the person responsible for the denial.

Thank you for your assistance on this matter.
Respectfully,

Carol McKinley

Monday, January 26, 2009

Faith Based Stalking





Washington Times Inside Blogotics

Faith-based stalking

We reported here last week about the arrest on prostitution charges, some involving the coercion of a minor, against a longtime liberal Catholic activist who was head of Ohio's Office on Faith-based Initiatives during 2007.

Catholic blogger Carol McKinley now asks about the timeline related to her blowing the whistle on Eric McFadden, who had a series of affiliations with liberal Catholic groups — Catholics for Kerry, the Catholic Alliance for the Common Good, and Ohio religious outreach for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's primary bid.

Mrs. McKinley wonders why Gov. Ted Strickland later brought Mr. McFadden onto the Clinton Ohio campaign and what was uncovered by any state investigation of Mr. McFadden's computer use.

"If your employee had a leadership problem in a dinky faith-based outreach operation, you wouldn't recruit him to run the Clinton/Strickland faith-based operation in the important state of Ohio, would you. … Strickland's staff certainly did not act upon what I provided them with because they were skeptical it was some kind of political ploy. They conducted their own investigation of his activities.

"Whatever Strickland's staff found … they shuffled him quickly out of the office for faith based initiatives. To say now that they were ignorant of any suspicious or threatening activity does not comport with the facts on record," she wrote.

It's common sense.




http://proecclesia.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-did-gov-strickland-know-and-when.html

the-american-catholic.com/2009/01/14/remember-catholics-for-kerry/

http://www.catholicreport.org/

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14857

http://chrisdickson.blogspot.com/2009/01/head-of-catholics-for-kerry-arrested.html

http://www.knarfoh.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=194

Sunday, January 25, 2009

More Chronicles of McFadia

There are some ongoing Developments in the Curious Case of Eric McFadden.

Tom Blumer at Newsbusters throws this question out there:

Given McFadden's heavy use of technology to to conduct his criminal enterprise, has anybody at the Dispatch investigated whether McFadden ever used state resources (telephones, Internet, etc.) while he was employed? Have any Freedom of Information Act requests been filed for all electronic and printed correspondence relating to the McFadden's appointment, his tenure at OFBCI, the circumstances surrounding his transfer to Corrections, or the end of his employment? If not, why not?

It's more than fair to ask what Ted Strickland or other state officials really knew about McFadden, and when they knew it.

Pursuant to this suggestion, I will be filing a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act to ask for information surrounding McFadden's tenure and departure - including copies of all communications and files relating to my complaint that McFadden was a dangerous person & using the internet as his main resource, any actions they took to investigate the legitimacy of my complaint - including and especially IT records of his internet traffic and pertinent emails while using his office computer in Strickland's faith-based offices.

When somebody lodges a complaint that your employee is using the internet to compulsively sexually harass and stalk in a manner that is intended to be threatening, the employer would call their IT department to check the history of his internet traffic.

Not to do so would be negligence. I've said all along - they went from not believing me to removing McFadden within days. They did an investigation and they found something.

Why was this man shuffled to a prison and then brought back into politics to do faith-based outreach for Ted Strickland and Hillary Clinton? Especially in light of the fact that they are trying to claim they fired him because he stunk at it.

Their story doesn't gel.

I suspect there is more to this than Mcfadden's various Sex Consumer Review Initiatives to direct traffic to a Brewery District Brothel.

Among his prostitutes was a 17 year-old girl whom McFadden met on Craig's list. He groomed her, took provocative and obscene photos of her & promoted her career.

Could it be possible that the tentacles of the money and sex are in some way wrapped around the rope and perks they gave McFadden?

Could McFadden have pimped out the teenager to some highly placed political people who then felt they needed to keep McFadden happy and employed to cover their gluteus maximus?

Seems to me the Democratic political establishment was keeping him employed no matter how egregious or lethal his conduct became.

For instance, it's a well-known story in the Ohio prostitute world that in 2006, during McFadden's employment with Catholics for the Common Good and prior to his employment in Strickland's office, a police report was filed by a woman claiming McFadden had kidnapped her, held her hostage and then was harassing her by telephone.

Details from the Columbus Ohio police report include two charges:

1. Telecommunications Harassment
2. Kidnapping

- and summary narrative:

VICTIM ALLEGES THAT SHE WAS HELD AGAINST HER WILL AT LISTED ADDRESS (RED ROOF INN) BY LISTED SUSPECT, AFTER HE/SUSPECT MADE A APPOINTMENT WITH SAID VICTIM FOR A "PRIVATE DANCE". VICTIM FURTHER ALLEGES THAT SINCE SAID INCIDENT, THE SUSPECT HAS BEEN CALLING HER BY TELEPHONE AND HARASSING HER.

I believe April of 2006 was about the same time he escalated his stalking and harassing with me that precipitated my call to the Columbus police. He was on a roll.

If McFadden was so lousy at faith-based outreach why would they rehire him? Why would Robert Kennedy Jr and Kathleen Townsend be using McFadden as their Clinton operation base in Ohio?

There was also a mystery surrounding McFadden's peculiar and swift departure from his post-Hillary appointment on the Paula Brooks campaign. Has anyone contacted Brooks to find out whether his sex, stalking or conduct intended to threaten manifested itself in any way?

As soon as I get the FOIA request completed, I'll post it. Turnaround time for that is customarily three days.

Stay tuned for more details for McFadden's Catholic Common Good Initiatives.

By the way, take a good look at the photograph in this post of the Brewery Brothel District. The irony that he spent his career trying to claim his motivations were inspired by his zeal for social justice to help the poor does not go unnoticed.

+++UPDATE

I've been sent information that while under the employ of "Catholics United", Eric McFadden claimed Bishop Frederick Campbell had called McFadden in to terrorize:

I'm redacting information of the victims of "Catholics United" - but the following letter was sent to Fr. Pavone in an attempt to get help after being bullied by the sociopath & sex predator during a mail drop in the 2008 elections:

Dear Fr. Pavone:

I worked with the Catholic Coalition for McCain here in Columbus, Ohio.

Preparing for the Catholic Coalition Literature drop on Sunday, Nov. 2nd, we read with assurance that you had contacted Catholics United and indicated you'd consider legal action if prolifers around the country were prevented from exercising our freedom of speech on public access church parking lots.

The harrassment, intimidation and stalking many "teams" of prolifers in Columbus diocese experienced at the hands of Eric McFadden, a wayward Knight of Columbus - who started "Knights for Obama" was despicable and embarrassing to all of us.

Many of the women were shocked and shaken by his verbal threats, taking photos of them and their car license plates. He also physically blocked them in and prevented them from moving off the parking lot.

He will be charged in both Upper Arlington, Ohio and Columbus, Ohio (as it happened in churches in both cities) He claimed he worked for our bishop, Fredrick Campbell. He most likely was called by several of the priests because he seemed to keep showing up at several parishes that we had trouble with angry priests.

Two interesting revelations in this letter.

One, McFadden was under the employ of Catholics United.

Two, Bishop Frederick Campbell and some of the priests in his diocese were employing "Catholics United", and in fact a pimp and sexual predator to use threats and intimidating conduct to prohibit Catholics from distributing the teachings of the Church in parishes where wayward priests are misleading their flocks.

I'm trying to extract the names of the priests in the diocese from the victims to publish - as well as include in the paper trail I'll be sending to the USCCB

I'll also be calling contacting the spokesperson for the Bishop to let him know the kind of characters "Catholics United" uses to intimidate and threaten and let him know I intend on filing a formal complaint against him at the USCCB office for "protecting children". Not only does it sound like he didn't go through a CORI process, if he's willing to use thuggery of sexual sociopaths to silence adult faithful Catholics - I don't think children are very "safe" in his diocese.

In case I've not made it clear kind of character Bishop Campbell and his priests used, the following post from McFadden's sex reviews should clear up any confusion. The man was so sexually obsessed, he had sex with three prostitutes in one evening. I hope the priests didn't let McFadden use the rest rooms where children are vulnerable:


Rainy Sunday Night Threesome

Damn - where to begin. I am not sure what got into me tonight - I have not done this in years....

I am on my way home from a friends - and found myself on W. Broad around 6:00pm - imagine that - sooo It is raining cats and dogs - so I figure not much out- right? WRONG - I see this tall girl on W. Broad and Richardson - basically a fatty -about 5'10 or so - says her name is _____ - 21 - she is cute though and has long hair - so I figure - not really up to my standards, but I got a big load built up that needs deposited - so she goes for a Jackson, so good news for the bargain hunters and we do the need -CBJCIM nearby - I dropped her off near Wilson and Broad. - she has digits. Great - however I am feeling tad bit horny still - sooo

I drive around a bit - see some skanks here and there - saw Ashleigh down in the bottoms - the bottoms _________ - but I had her not long ago and am looking for something else - then around 7:30pm I see __________ - she is about 5'5, long black hair curly. Cute face - says 26 yrs -She was near Broad and Avondale. so she gets a bit naked for me - has some nice little t**ties and a nice *ss to play with - we go to my favorite spot and another CIM. Dropped her off at Sully and Dakota. She has digits

I am still a bit antsy - not sure why - drive around a bit more - see some BSWs and some more skanks - then I pop up on these three WSWs behind Wendys near Central around 9:15pm- I did not get good looks at the others - because the one was WOW - turns out her name is _______ - 19 - about 5'8 red hair , nice firm D cups - awesome *ss - just a nice tight 19 year old body - dressed nice, nice skin and smells good - so I figure what the f*ck - and off we go - turns out she remembers me and I remember her now - I reported on her last summer - she went by ____ then - I think that is her real name- she was dressed a bit skimpier then. Off to my favorit place - she has a great box and let me play with it - sucked on this nice melon size firm natural t*ts for a...

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Boston Mom Accuses McFadden's Previous Employers of Cover Up

.- A Boston-area Catholic woman is accusing a social justice group of ignoring her warnings that a former employee, who is now jailed under prostitution-related charges, was a danger to women. She also claims that she was threatened with a lawsuit if she made her accusations public, an allegation the group denies.

Carol McKinley, a Boston-area mother and national pro-life activist, told CNA in a phone interview that she first contacted Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good (CACG) during the first week of February, 2007 to warn them about harassing behavior by Eric McFadden.

McFadden, who was arrested January 14, 2009 on seven charges related to promoting prostitution, was in the midst of leaving CACG when McKinley first called to report the harassment.

Actually, when I first contacted them on February 4th - nobody mentioned that McFadden had resigned from CACG. There are no crystal balls at the McKinley abode, but I never bought that story, just as I don't buy it from Strickland's office. Even Kelley's own story supports the fact that McFadden left five days after I sent my first correspondence.

Alexia Kelley, the Executive Director of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, told CNA in an email that “Carol McKinley sent correspondence to our offices on February 5, 2007. By that date, Eric McFadden had already submitted his resignation. His last day as an employee with Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good was February 9, 2007.”

When CNA asked Kelley if McFadden exhibited any strange behavior that led to his resignation, she replied, “No he did not.”

See no evil, hear no evil.


According to McKinley, when she spoke with Kelley, she informed her of intimidating messages allegedly left by McFadden on her blog as well as emails sent from his personal email account.

There is no doubt in her mind, says McKinley, that the comments were left by McFadden because she would receive comments on her blog, and then on the same day, emails containing identical comments from McFadden’s personal email account.

Using tracking software on her website, McKinley was able to determine that she was receiving visits from the same IP address in Dublin, Ohio “nearly every five minutes.” On one particular day, she registered 82 visits from the Dublin address.

A copy of the email Carol McKinley sent to Kelley on February 5, 2007 detailed some of McFadden’s alleged rants and was obtained by CNA.

McFadden reportedly commented:

“Carol an other whack jobs come nowhere close to the message of love of Pope John Paul II. Do not soil his name by associating him with the heretic whack jobs. There is nothing Democratic here. It is the Republican Party that twists the life issue to fit its own sick agenda that is not in line with Church teaching. People like the witch Carol who aligned themselves with the Republican party have placed themselves in a state of excommunication and will be dealt with by Cannon law.”

“A law suit according to Cannon law has been filed. The heretic McKinley will be brought before the witches council for trial before the next full moon.”

Other messages, according to McKinley, accused her of being a “practicing lesbian” who donated to gay and lesbian groups and was not in accord with the Church’s teaching.

McKinley explained to CNA that, “I was extremely concerned that McFadden was victimizing other people, that his tone to me included strange sexual nuances and bizarre commentary that were the utterings of a very unbalanced man.”

However, McKinley claims that when she contacted Kelley, instead of addressing her concerns, Kelley retorted that Eric McFadden no longer worked for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and that if she made her allegations against McFadden public, she would be served with a lawsuit.

Kelley remembers the situation differently, saying she was alarmed to hear McKinley’s allegations, but that when she attempted to verify McKinley’s claims, she was unable to do so.

In hindsight, in light of McFadden's arrest and known behaviors, does this cause her to re-evalute the complaint made to her two years ago alleging McFadden was a predator?

She was "alarmed" that McFadden might be a predator but she invited McFadden and Patrick Whelan in their new initiative "Catholic Democrats"to take a leadership role in her 2008 how to vote for an abortionist Catholic Conference.

Two things of note in the above links, Patrick Whelan is frantically trying to erase any weblinks of Catholic Democrats that reference McFadden as his co-founder so you have to get that in caches - - and note McFadden's wiggy comment when NCR misplaces the crown of who's who in the Catholics for Kerry shtick. (n.b. Now that we know he was coming up for air from the back seat of his car between prostitute runs to post the comment, his notations about anyone elses "sex scandal" is tasteless.)

The Catholics in Alliance director also denied that anyone at her organization threatened to sue McKinley. “We said that we would refer the matter to our lawyer, one of whom she had already written on 2/5/07. We never threatened a lawsuit; and never said anything about her going public or not.”

McKinley remains adamant that her phone conversation with Kelley transpired differently.

“If McFadden tendered his resignation prior to February 5th, why would she take a complaint on February 5th against a former employee? Typically, employers will say ‘so and so is no longer an employee.’ I stand by my testimony. Alexia was rude to me, said Eric did a great job for them, that I was trying to destroy the reputation of a ‘good man’ and that I should brace myself for litigation if I pursued these allegations,” she said.

“I stand by my testimony. CACG protected and enabled Mr. McFadden and threatened the complainant. Laity needs to be held to the same standard as we hold priests and Bishops,” McKinley affirmed to CNA in an email.


Chris Korzen, Executive Director of Catholics United, was also a part of the conversation with McKinley since his organization is formally related to CACG.

Mrs. McKinley, who is employed as a legal assistant, claimed that Korzen would not give her an email address or a physical address for CACG's corporate lawyer so that she could notify the lawyer of the danger posed by McFadden.

CNA contacted Korzen on Monday, but he said that he did not have any information that would be useful and would not speak on record about the allegations.

During the course of her correspondence with Korzen, McKinley said that she had explained how in the summer of 2006 she contacted the police department in Columbus, Ohio because she was afraid McFadden’s words would turn into physical retaliation.

The Columbus police, McKinley said, told her that she would have to deal with McFadden locally by taking out a restraining order against him at the Boston Police Department. McKinley did not file a restraining order, reasoning that since she believed McFadden to be “criminally insane,” and that it would only make him “all the more dangerous.”


This cover up for her enabling a predator pretty much sews up whether her story is credible:

As far as Catholics in Alliance is concerned, the allegations against McFadden were out of their court once McKinley called the police. Kelley explained to CNA in an email that, “we deferred to them as law enforcement authorities to conduct an investigation. However, Catholics in Alliance was never contacted by them.”

Read my letter to them again.

In it, I say that in the past, I had found McFadden's behavior so threatening that I had called the police, that I had decided at that I would be safer not to pursue that course of action. She knew my contact with her and the allegations I was making was not under any police investigation.

Kelley also adds that, “at no time” did anyone associated with CACG “instruct Mr. McFadden to communicate with Ms. McKinley in any way” and that they “would never condone such actions.”

That is a straw man's argument and doesn't comport with the laws.

When your business is about executing political strategy and you hire an employee whose political strategy is to threaten, send numerous and compulsive messages with concepts that are unhinged, with inappropriate and peculiar sexual nuances - whether you condone it or not is moot. That's the nature of her business. There's a little thing called negligent hiring and negligent supervision that actually holds the employers accountable for such things.

Like, when the taxi company hires a drunk and they drive into a tree on the way to airport.

Or when a Bishop ordains a pedophile.

“In any event, it is extremely unfortunate that such vitriolic exchanges took place. As Catholics committed to promoting the common good, we emphasize the need for individuals to debate their differences with civility and respect,” Kelley said.

Following his stint at Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, Eric McFadden was hired by Ohio Governor Ted Strickland to head up his Office for Faith Based Initiatives.

Meanwhile, McKinley continued to receive harassing messages, leading her to email Strickland's office on October 10, 2007.

A little more than two weeks after McKinley made contact with the governor’s legal counsel Christine Thompson, McFadden had his pay cut and was transferred to the corrections department on Oct. 28, 2007, where he coordinated volunteer and outreach efforts for the prison system's faith-based services. McFadden held that position until March 2008 when his position was eliminated as a part of budget cuts.

Keith Dailey, Gov. Strickland’s spokesman, told the Cleveland Plain Dealer that McFadden’s departure from the position was due to his struggle with the job. "This was a leadership position and after some time it became clear it wasn't a good fit and it wasn't working out." "It was a mutually agreed decision," Dailey said.

McKinley explains her motivation for trying to expose McFadden’s past actions is not personal payback for the continual harassment she and her children endured. “I want these organizations to be held accountable for covering up McFadden’s behavior,” she said, charging that his previous employers are acting like some Catholic bishops did when priests were accused of sexual abuse.

Here are the million dollar questions:

Do the records of his compulsive sex postings indicate they were made during work hours of his tenure at Strickland's office?

When Strickland's staff got my complaint with information suggesting McFadden was an internet stalker and most likely a dangerous predator based upon my experiences - did they look at his internet traffic from his work computer?

If you hire a predator and you are given notice he is a predator and you threaten the complainant, enable him or shuffle him to a prison or in spite of the fact that you think he stinks at faith-outreach leadership positions, hire him a few months later in a Presidential campaign where you are stumping for Vice President, it's time for "change we can believe in".


Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Holding lay people accountable for what they knew and when they knew it

I have been speaking with a few reporters who are gathering information to write about the knowledge I gave about Eric McFadden to Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Strickland's office starting in early 2007.

It's CYA time, and I suspect the one thing we are not going to hear as their response, is: "Yes, now that you mention it, we did have a credible accusation and we ignored it".

They're going to say they didn't believe it, which is exactly what laity, the press and a great many lawyers have been lambasting the Chanceries, Bishops and priests for, isn't it?

Saying "We didn't believe it" doesn't cut it when a 17 year old girl has been exploited, used and passed off to others to use.

In hindsight, now knowing McFadden's history of obsessions with pandering obscenities, sexuality, intimidation, threats and compelling a minor into prostitution - taking photos of her in his wife's car, might this cause them to re-evaluate the complaint made to them two years ago alleging he was a predator?

I've been thinking about Strickland's office story that it is a coincidence Eric left the faith-based office a day or two after I sent links to things Eric authored, IP addresses, direct quotes of Eric's and a summary of my fears he was a predator and McFadden left because he "couldn't lead a faith-based effort".

As I've said in a previous posting - that is nonsensical because Strickland rounded him up for faith-based outreach when he was running strategy with Hillary Clinton - in the important state of Ohio (in a campaign where he was the number one pick for VP).

Let's face it. After receiving my complaint, Strickland's legal and human resource team would not call Eric into the office and say "We got a letter saying you are weird and so we are letting you go".

They did their own investigation.

Considering my allegations that McFadden was doing his tormenting, threatening, sexual harassing, etc., via the internet - if they didn't call in the IT department and check out what kind of sites he was visiting, that would be a pretty serious negligence in investigation. Big brother watches, there is a recording of where you traffic.

I've been thinking something a commenter wrote in the comboxes:


A commenter posts below that he did some internet research on the names Eric McFadden was using to post his internet reviews of prostitutes.

It's hard to believe it's possible they were unaware of his double life and addiction to prostitutes just from what one can find if you search around and see how obsessive he was about it. That they were also warned by you, though, it's pretty damning.

I searched his name SullivantGuy and was taken to a still-active prostitution-review web site called USASexGuide (I assume this is a different site than the one he set up). In the Columbus, Ohio, section, McFadden can be seen obsessively posting his disgusting reviews for years! It actually appears that he was picking up hookers on an almost daily basis, and I saw that even other people posting on that site sometimes thought he was creepy and alleged he would be stalkerish to prostitutes.
Link here, but you probably don't wanna browse that stuff -- it's disturbing. It gives you a feel for why Columbus police are referring to him as the "guru" of prostitution in Columbus. He is someone with some severe problems, so severe I doubt they went unnoticed by Strickland's people.

With all the obsessive postings, I bet there's a trail of some he posted when he was supposedly at work at Strickland's office?

That would make it pretty damning that Strickland's office had the kind of evidence they had, along with a complaint - - - to shuffle him into a prison where inmates have a credibility problem when they bring forward an allegation of abuse? Giving him the promotion to do faith-based outreach for Hillary and Strickland's POTUS and VPOTUS campaign - - is all pretty disturbing.

According to the website the commenter found- under Broad Street guy, he posted 575 reviews. That's only one out of four persona. Sullivant Guy has 486 postings. Further, this site appears to be in addition to the site HE was operating. Some of those would appear to be during work hours and during his tenure at the Governor's office. The Governor is not going to reveal what they found, but certainly diligence and a spreadsheet of the months he worked for Strickland and dates/hours of his postings may get to an answer.

Here's a few I picked out...these need to check out with a calendar tomorrow but I'm betting some of them are work days?


08-16-07, 09:46

08-11-07, 09:22

08-04-07, 15:07
08-03-07, 10:19

08-02-07, 09:02

07-28-07, 09:04

06-10-07, 14:15


Just to give you an idea of how creepy this guy was, he appeared to be making hay with the whores several times a week and some of those were several times a day. He sure was an early riser, no pun intended, as he repeatedly claims the best time to get the ones who take a bath and have clean clothes was between 5 and 8 in the morning. He sometimes describes seeking service from several of them in succession before he scooted off to work. No wonder this guy didn't have time for daily Mass or the gym.

(Ok, I'm being catty...moving right along...)

I'm going to post a few soundbytes to show just how creepy this guy was.

Sounds like some of them were ducking him. There's one post that he says he has to take one of the woman's shoes or purse so she won't ditch him? I'm trying to redact the sex talk but I hope I don't miss some of the lingo. Please let me know if I do and I'll redact it.


1. Best looking SW - Earlier this year I met _____ around Broad and Centeral - Killer body - saw her a couple other times, then she went down hill fast. Got nasty real fast. There were a couple others I met this past year that were just down right hot, but never saw them again. Possibly one timers or passing through.

2. Best Body - For me right now - this nice ________ on the hilltop. ______ is a close second

3. Best **** talent - _______ - I know she is new, well at least to me --- but damn this girl has skills.

4. Best Attitude - Giving the prize to the new girl again.

5. Worst Looking - I don't stop for em, so I don't get to know their names.

6. Worst Attitude - If they display a bad attitude - out the door they go.

Worst Attitude change to better- don't mess with attitude

Best Attitude change to worst- Don't hang with em for that change

Best Looking to bad- I agree with ________ on ______ - I simply pass her by now. - but the ______ I am refering to is a faster and worse dive. ________ on the west side took a nose dive as well. Oh yeah - I think _________ in the short north went south quick as well.

Worst ** to Best- if they are that bad - I ususally forget their name and don't give em a second chance

*

Ran around the west side for a bit early evening yesterday. Saw some regular skanks. Did not meet anybody I was interested in. ________number now goes straight to voice mail. Oh well. I did see 3 SW's on the wall near the Clark Station on Broad in the Hilltop. One was a blonde, older - total skank. The other was a pudgy platium blonde - not attractive at all, and the third was a thin brunette who actually look cute from afar (they all do) Upon closer inspection, I found out her name was ______ - but her teeth were not so great looking....

As for hours - I have found the best lately and the times I have actually met and had a good time is early morning - 5:30am to about 8am.

Stay safe

*

The storms woke me up this morning - so I went out for an early morning drive. First I met _____ - I had digits for her from a Sr Member, but they had not been working. She is early 30s. Pretty face. Great service. Have new digits for her for Sr. Members only. Met her on Sully in bottoms.

It had been awhile since I had a ***************, and _______ did do a great job, but I was still in need of some more ********. So after I dropped her off, I cruised around a bit. I met ______. I reported on her a while back. A very nice person and great attitude. Kind of cute in a very ******* sort of way. She was very clean today and had put on some weight. Said she just got out. She provided outstanding service for the second of the day. Sadly - no digits for Pam. Met her on Broad in the bottoms....

I did pull up on one on sully in the hilltop - that was kind of cute - then she opened her mouth and she had like one tooth! Sorry - Told her I thought she was someone I knew and rolled on.
*

Also ____ makes good points below about not fronting funds for the "__________". You have to think, if she comes out and actually does get in your car - what she will bring with her. Now if you really must take the chance and it is a girl you know and "trust", still cover your butt. Make her leave something of value to her in your car. Like her purse, if she has one or her shoes. If she won't do that. Forget it. Also don't sit there and wait - drive around the block and come back in 10 or so. If you really want to see this girl, the promise of more funds and holding something value will most likely make her reappear. I don't suggest this for the monger new to the scence. Know what you are doing before doing something risky. In the case of _________, holding the purse and shoes did the trick, and even though the service was crappy...
*

Two Fer

Out Saturday night - met ____ by ________ on Broad. Short hair brunette. Great skills. This girl is always clean and showered with clean clothes.

Then saw _______at Westpark and Sully. She was cleaned up today as well and tells me that she is not pregnant as she thought.


I suppose these posts could be considered faith-based outreach while working for Strickland's office:


Posted By Sullivant Guy




OH BULL****T. Carter was in for 4 years - then you are telling me that 12 years of Reagan/Bush did nothing ....then 8 years of Clinton -and now 8 years of Bush and some how just the Democrats during that time did this..

Hope you have some boots on cause you are standing in some smelly s**t.

It is called Deregulation and it go worse because of the f***ing RETARD who is President. People voted for the ***hole because they thought they could drink a beer with him. Who wants Barney the drunk as President?

Dodd and Frank have only had those committees for the past two years = you act as if the Republican led congress prior to that had nothing to do with it.

The Democrats were unable to pass legislation as Bush blocked it for the past two years and the Republicans before that had their way - one party rule never works...

*


31 Similarities Between Hitler and President Bush

We all know that Glenn is a member of the Neo Con GOP -todays version of the Hitler Youth. :)

31 Similarities Between Hitler and President Bush....

When President Bush decided to invade Iraq, his spokesmen began comparing Saddam Hussein to Adolph Hitler, the most monstrous figure in modern history. Everybody was therefore shocked when a high German bureaucrat turned the tables by comparing Bush himself with Hitler. As to be expected, she (the bureaucrat) was forced to resign because of her extreme disrespect for an American president. However, the resemblance sticks--there are too many similarities to be ignored, some of which may be listed here.

1.

Like Hitler, President Bush was not elected by a majority, but was forced to engage in political maneuvering in order to gain office.




The 2008 Presidential Election

Posted By Sullivant Guy



For Retard Glenn

:) :) :)

This is all in good fun - you are great monger my friend - but a political retard. :)

Read on...

Bush and Hitler
Compare and Contrast



Reading through the thousands of posts, in consideration of how much time, focus and the spiritual nature of this addiction, saying there was no manifestation McFadden was a sociopath is simply not believable.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Eric McFadden the Sociopath Has Finally Been Arrested

The law has finally caught up with Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good/Catholic Democrats sociopath Eric McFadden.

After many years of his stalking and psychopathic behaviors, I certainly will sleep a little more soundly at night knowing he has finally been exposed.

McFadden obsessively communicated (sometimes 20 or 30 times) the most bizarre, threatening/lunatic stuff, not only to me - but to Deal Hudson, and I'm sure other pro-lifers. Some of you may recall that once, during one of his compulsive psychotic periods of threats, I actually called the Ohio police, explained to them that his conduct was making me fearful for my life, my home, my children. They suggested I file a restraining order - which of course only makes criminally insane people all the more dangerous and I decided in prudence not to.

The former director of the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives for the governor of Ohio was arrested Wednesday for his involvement in an online prostitution ring. Eric McFadden, who has also formerly served as the president of the organization Catholics for Faithful Citizenship and spokesperson for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, will face seven prostitution-related charges tomorrow in court.

Eric McFadden, 46, the former head of the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives for Governor of Ohio, Ted Strickland, was arrested this morning and faces two counts of promoting prostitution, two counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor, two counts of pandering obscenity involving a nude minor and one count of compelling prostitution, Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O'Brien told the Springfield News-Sun.

His communications to me were so sexually charged and threatening and along with his obsession with tormenting Deal Hudson, I always suspected there was self-loathing over some kind of sexual deviancy going on with him fueled by deranged malice towards women.

Ted Strickland is claiming to be shocked over McFadden's conduct, which I would characterize as untruthful and, I have the paper trail to prove it. I know for a fact that Strickland and his staff KNEW McFadden had a deep rooted and frightening sociopathy. Specifically, they were informed that his man particularly victimized and bullied women. Further, even though Strickland and his staff knew, they covered it up and shuffled him from their office to Hillary Clinton's national campaign. God knows how many women would have been spared McFadden's bondage if they had stepped up the plate and taken him out of commission when they had the knowledge he was a dangerous person. He used to claim Pelosi was the power behind him and would use her political power to bankrupt through false accusations, use the IRS to scrutinize your tax returns until they found something they could exploit to claim you were evading taxes, and various other delusions if anyone dared to call the police or expose him. He is a sicko.

I'm sure McFadden was confident Strickland and Clinton would cover his back as they had for many years - along with Patrick Whelan of Catholic Democrats, Chris Korzen, Alexia Kelly and other Democrats who were aware of this lunatic and kept him on the payrolls. Of course he was brazen.

Police said they have seized a computer and two vehicles. One was his wife's car...
Police have identified the girl, who is cooperating with the investigation.


I'd like to say this is unbelievable, but it just isn't.


***UPDATE HERE FOR MORE DETAILS.


UPDATE # 2: I've posted excerpts from my email to Christine Thompson, Legal Counsel for Governor Strickland in this post.